Recently, a fascinating discussion has emerged in the Solana ecosystem around token strategies—whether to continue buybacks or to provide growth incentives for holders. A founder of a leading Layer 1 blockchain responded with a core perspective: instead of passive buybacks, it’s better to rethink from the perspective of traditional financial capital accumulation logic.



He pointed out that in traditional finance, true capital accumulation usually takes more than a decade. To replicate this long-term structure in the crypto industry, the closest mechanism is actually staking. This may seem simple, but the logic is profound: participants willing to lock their assets for the long term effectively dilute those seeking short-term gains at the mechanism level.

An even more interesting aspect is the operational approach—protocols can accumulate profits and convert them into future claimable assets. Users who choose to lock their assets for a year to participate in staking will, as the protocol’s balance sheet continues to expand, see their actual权益 proportion increase over time.

Of course, some are concerned about hedging arbitrage risks. The response is straightforward: the权益 itself is linked to the protocol’s future profits and will grow as收益 continues to increase. In other words, the arbitrage space will be gradually squeezed by the growth of the fundamentals.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 10
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
BridgeJumpervip
· 01-06 13:17
Staking is much more reliable than buybacks; true capital accumulation is inherently a long-term game.
View OriginalReply0
ApeEscapeArtistvip
· 01-06 11:38
Staking this logic is indeed ruthless; long-term thinkers directly outcompete short-term greedy people.
View OriginalReply0
SerLiquidatedvip
· 01-06 06:11
Staking is more aggressive than buybacks, directly causing short-term players to淘汰 themselves.
View OriginalReply0
HallucinationGrowervip
· 01-05 05:21
Staking this logic is actually just a disguised way to cut leeks... Can locking up for a year really wait for fundamental growth? I feel like it's just another pie in the sky.
View OriginalReply0
DegenMcsleeplessvip
· 01-03 13:51
Can staking really last more than ten years? I'm still a bit skeptical.
View OriginalReply0
RektHuntervip
· 01-03 13:49
Staking this logic is indeed smarter than simple buybacks, and long-term participants are truly being incentivized.
View OriginalReply0
BrokenDAOvip
· 01-03 13:47
Extending the staking period is not wrong, but the key is whether the protocol itself can continue to generate profits... That's the real issue.
View OriginalReply0
GateUser-6bc33122vip
· 01-03 13:41
Staking logic sounds good, but ultimately it still depends on whether the fundamentals can keep up.
View OriginalReply0
ContractExplorervip
· 01-03 13:35
Staking this logic is actually just a disguised way to cut short-term players, I think there's nothing wrong with that.
View OriginalReply0
blocksnarkvip
· 01-03 13:35
Staking this logic is really just a disguised punishment for those who are impatient and eager for quick gains, I like it.
View OriginalReply0
View More
  • Pin

Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)