After several cycles of bull and bear markets, the most enduring narrative in the crypto space has settled on RWA and asset tokenization. Honestly, this might be the biggest area of imagination and the ultimate development direction for the entire crypto market.



What is the current situation? The data speaks for itself:

The total value of stablecoins has surpassed $296 billion, with over 200 million users. Real asset tokenization products circulating on public blockchains exceed $19 billion. Just tokenized US Treasuries and cash equivalents amount to $8.83 billion, and tokenized commodities like gold exceed $3.5 billion. These figures are hard to imagine at the beginning of 2025.

But here’s the problem— for ordinary investors, this area seems to lack participation feel, and it’s hard to find the kind of overnight wealth opportunities that once existed.

In fact, identifying high-quality RWA projects is much simpler than chasing hot projects. Just remember two questions: where does the value originate, and where is it being controlled?

The destination of the value is clear: it flows into three areas—on-chain USD yields, RWA collateral, and institutional settlement and custody infrastructure. Anything outside of these can be seen as riding the trend.

If you’re unsure about the RWA landscape, directly using LINK is relatively safer. Aave is also deeply involved in this direction, integrating tokenized government bonds, CLOs, and other institutional-grade assets. AAVE is also worth paying attention to, although the risks are higher.

The greatest potential still lies in the beneficiaries of the RWA collateral lending track. Currently, besides AAVE, MORPHO and CFG have some layout in this area, but both face significant compliance and price risks. Since AAVE’s price base is already quite high, its growth potential is limited. Ondo’s Flux Finance is also worth watching.
RWA-4.94%
AAVE-4.77%
MORPHO-3.69%
CFG-4.69%
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 9
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
GasGrillMastervip
· 01-05 10:38
好家伙,RWA这波真的是长期主义者的天下了,再也回不到那个一币一别墅的年代了。 说白了就是在做正事儿,但暴富梦碎了属实有点难受... LINK稳是稳,但我觉得MORPHO那边的想象力可能更大,就是风险确实得慎重。 又或者其实就该老老实实拿AAVE吃安稳的美元收益,别老想着翻倍了。 等等,CFG的合规风险到底有多大啊,有人了解不?
Reply0
GateUser-e51e87c7vip
· 01-03 18:35
RWA is indeed the ultimate narrative, but honestly, ordinary retail investors don't have much role here; it still feels like an institution's playground. The combination of LINK and AAVE is stable, but there's no thrill of doubling your investment anymore, which is a bit boring. MORPHO and CFG both have such high compliance risks, yet people still dare to get involved? While the data looks good, it seems only the top players can really make money; the rest are just riding the wave. This time, we probably won't see the kind of wealth explosion we saw last year. RWA is just about gradually getting richer. The question is, can these people really manage on-chain assets well? It still feels a bit early. Has anyone used Flux Finance? It seems much less popular than AAVE; it's a bit of a dark horse. $8.83 billion in tokenized US debt sounds like a lot, but how much is left for individual investors? Instead of stressing over MORPHO's risks, it's safer to go directly with AAVE, even if there's not much imagination involved. The point about value creation and grasping opportunities is quite accurate, but the complexity is really too high for retail investors. However, RWA is undeniable; the participation method just needs to change—no more gambling mentality.
View OriginalReply0
0xSoullessvip
· 01-03 13:52
Forget it, RWA is just a new disguise for institutions to harvest retail investors. Ordinary people should not even think about it. I've played with both LINK and AAVE—one is incredibly stable, and the other is ridiculously expensive. Choosing either means being manipulated. Nice words are asset tokenization, but in reality, it's just big players grabbing territory. The four words "regulatory risk" basically mean it could explode at any time. I wouldn't dare to touch CFG and MORPHO. It's just hype; does $296 billion USD really justify that market rally?
View OriginalReply0
RooftopReservervip
· 01-03 13:52
The numbers are big and impressive, but can it really make money? LINK is stable and steady, but there's not much excitement. I got into AAVE early; now it's just a matter of whether it can double. RWA feels like working for institutions. MORPHO has such high risk, I think I'll pass. These infrastructure projects are indeed boring, but they might really be the future.
View OriginalReply0
BoredWatchervip
· 01-03 13:49
No matter how well the numbers are arranged, it doesn't change one fact — retail investors still have to rely on luck, while institutions are quietly taking the profits.
View OriginalReply0
RunWhenCutvip
· 01-03 13:45
So now it's about earning interest with stablecoins, waiting for the RWA infrastructure to be in place before jumping in? LINK and AAVE sound stable, but it seems like the growth potential is limited... Could small players like MORPHO be the dark horse?
View OriginalReply0
NoStopLossNutvip
· 01-03 13:45
Numbers look good, but very few projects actually deliver real results.
View OriginalReply0
tx_or_didn't_happenvip
· 01-03 13:39
Really, this wave of RWA seems fundamentally solid, but it just lacks that exciting feeling, no thrill. LINK and AAVE are indeed stable, but I still can't quite understand how MORPHO works. Wait, can LINK really benefit from the RWA dividends? It feels like the expectations have already been driven to the limit. The data looks great, but the key issue is how retail investors can get on board—that's the real problem. I need to do more research on Ondo; it feels like it has too little presence. RWA collateralized lending seems to have the most potential, but compliance risks really have blocked a lot of people from entering. Honestly, instead of worrying about AAVE's user base, it's better to see who is actually implementing institutional-level asset integration.
View OriginalReply0
ChainWatchervip
· 01-03 13:35
The data is indeed frightening, but when I turn around, AAVE and LINK are still the most stable... Can I really get rich overnight haha --- The hype around RWA is really hot, but it still feels a bit far for retail investors --- MORPHO and CFG are so risky, might as well just copy the homework and go for LINK --- Compliance risk is so mysterious, who can really grasp it? It's better to choose stability --- Over 29 billion in stablecoins, but still no real sense of participation... Am I too narrow-minded? --- The three main points where value is created and controlled are these, everything else is just hype, remember that --- AAVE has a large user base but limited growth potential, this logic is a bit confusing, should I buy or not? --- I've never even heard of Flux Finance, now I have to do homework again, so annoying --- Only now do I realize that chasing hot trends isn't as good as understanding the logic of RWA, it's really exhausting
View OriginalReply0
View More
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
English
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)