I once had a friend who trades, and when he came to me, his account only had 3,000 yuan left. He originally invested over 20,000 yuan, but due to frequent operations and repeated trial and error, he gradually wiped out his principal.

I didn't give him any complicated techniques, just shared the most basic approach—never risk more than 30% of a single position, take profits at 10%-15%, cut losses immediately if they exceed 4%, and avoid participating in markets with unclear directions.

His initial reaction was "That's too slow." But after sticking to this method for three months, his account grew from 3,000 to nearly 40,000. The most memorable thing he told me later was: "It's not that the market has improved, but that I finally learned to hold back."

The underlying logic of this transformation is actually very simple—

**Survive first, then win**

Control each trade within 20%-30% of your total funds. Even if you make a wrong judgment, you won't damage the core, and when the timing is right, you can add to your position.

**Profit is accumulated, not gambled**

Take partial profits of 10%-15%, and cut losses decisively within 4%. The market fears those who are not greedy and do not hold unrealistic fantasies.

**Follow the trend, don't try to predict it**

Abandon the temptation to bottom-fish or top-take. Wait until signals are clear before acting. It may seem slow, but it's actually the fastest way.

**The value of review is often underestimated**

Review your trading records daily, mark your mistakes, and continuously iterate your strategy. Discipline is more of a protective umbrella than a constraint.

Many people think making money requires advanced skills or insider information. In reality, what eliminates people in the crypto world is not lack of ability, but inability to control themselves. Those who truly make money are often the ones who execute basic rules properly.

If you're still stuck in a cycle of losses, take a moment to ask yourself—are the market targeting you, or are you just repeating the same mistake?