When it comes to blockchain, many people will mention an obvious assumption: smart contracts execute automatically, the system is objectively trustworthy, and results are tamper-proof.



But developers who have actually worked on the chain know well—there is an ancient problem hidden here.

Contracts are actually "blind." They don't know about real-world price fluctuations, the authenticity of documents, or the outcomes of events, let alone understand the chaotic, slow, and contradictory real-world data. Because of this blind spot, oracles become the most critical link in the entire system.

The usual approach is to try to make the blockchain "understand the world." But APRO's idea goes against this—rather than forcing understanding, it's better to admit that reality is inherently chaotic. The dirtiest, most complex, and most error-prone tasks are simply handled off-chain.

How exactly? For example, when dealing with files, images, texts, legal documents, APRO uses multiple methods off-chain—OCR recognition, rule extraction, AI-assisted judgment—to break down, identify, and structure step by step. The key is to leave traces at every step, so they can be replayed and reviewed.

Only when this information has been cross-verified by multiple nodes and confirmed that "the entire story is clear" will it be officially submitted to the chain via cryptographic proof. On-chain, it's quite simple—verify signatures, check data integrity, then trigger the contract logic.

The core of this logic is actually very simple: the issue with data is not fundamentally technical but a matter of responsibility. Data put on the chain may involve clearing, compensation, or legal consequences—one cannot just upload it because it’s "close enough."
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 10
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
TokenAlchemistvip
· 01-06 05:15
ngl this is just moving the garbage disposal problem off-chain... now you're betting on whoever's doing the off-chain computation actually gives a damn about accuracy. not seeing how that solves the oracle problem, just redistributes it.
Reply0
GateUser-9f682d4cvip
· 01-05 11:08
Off-chain processing with on-chain verification— I like this approach much more than those who boast about "full decentralization."
View OriginalReply0
SellTheBouncevip
· 01-04 01:26
Sounds good, but to be honest, can this theory really work in practice? With more off-chain verification, the risk of centralization actually increases. In the end, you still have to trust people.
View OriginalReply0
ser_we_are_earlyvip
· 01-04 01:03
Haha, off-chain processing is the right approach. Those previous schemes that insisted on putting everything on the chain were indeed foolish. To be honest, oracles themselves are trust black holes; the APRO approach is actually more pragmatic. Data accountability system, finally someone has spoken out. Simple on-chain, complex off-chain—sounds right, but who will do the auditing? This feels like true engineering thinking, not just armchair idealism. It's all for that one step of verification, so troublesome.
View OriginalReply0
0xDreamChaservip
· 01-03 15:47
Oracle issues are a well-worn topic; off-chain processing ideas are indeed practical. On-chain and off-chain division of labor—finally, someone dares to tell the truth. "Almost correct" and then put on the chain? That would have already caused a disaster; responsibility must be properly assigned. I appreciate this multi-node cross-validation logic, but how can we ensure that off-chain nodes are truly reliable when it’s implemented? Admitting the chaotic reality and compromising to handle it is actually much smarter than forcing everything on-chain to solve all problems.
View OriginalReply0
DeFiDoctorvip
· 01-03 15:46
The medical records show that the clinical performance of this architecture is quite good—introducing a responsibility system into the oracle, which is somewhat similar to the solution for the old problem discovered during DeFi health checks. However, regular reviews are necessary. Off-chain verification must truly achieve "traceability at every step" to give me peace of mind. Otherwise, the problem might just shift to another place.
View OriginalReply0
HashBardvip
· 01-03 15:43
honestly the oracle problem never really goes away, just shifts around... APRO's flipping the script tho, feels right. let the messy stuff stay messy offchain, actually take responsibility for once
Reply0
MeaninglessGweivip
· 01-03 15:39
Handling the dirty work off-chain, verifying real value on-chain — this is the pragmatic approach.
View OriginalReply0
RamenStackervip
· 01-03 15:37
Well said, off-chain processing with on-chain verification—that's the true way to go.
View OriginalReply0
JustAnotherWalletvip
· 01-03 15:28
Handling the dirty and tedious work off-chain, only verifying on-chain—this approach is indeed clear-headed.
View OriginalReply0
View More
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
English
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)