SIONG, the co-founder of Jupiter, recently posed a thought-provoking question: Last year, over $70 million was spent on JUP buybacks, yet the price did not experience the expected increase. Instead of continuing to spend money on buybacks, could reallocating these funds toward user growth incentives and community building more directly drive ecosystem development?



Once this suggestion was made, another major player in the Solana ecosystem also expressed their opinion. They pointed out an interesting phenomenon — in traditional finance, establishing a capital reserve pool typically requires an investment cycle of over 10 years. If the crypto ecosystem adopts a similar long-term capital accumulation model, it might be more reliable than rushing into buybacks.

Their alternative proposal is to introduce a staking mechanism. By incentivizing users to lock up tokens long-term, capital can be accumulated, which not only locks in holder participation but also lays the foundation for future asset profits for the protocol. The benefit of this approach is the creation of a virtuous cycle — users earn rewards through staking and are willing to hold tokens long-term, while the project can also maintain a more stable capital base.

From a certain perspective, this discussion reflects a new exploration in tokenomics design by DeFi project teams. Pure buyback and token burning have long seemed somewhat crude; how to use incentive mechanisms and long-term anchoring to maintain token value and ecosystem vitality is becoming a key consideration for many teams. This is especially relevant for community members interested in Solana ecosystem developments and seeking new investment ideas, and it’s worth pondering more deeply.
JUP-5.13%
SOL-2.5%
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 5
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
BearHuggervip
· 01-04 19:28
70 million burned yet still not rising, how outrageous is that...
View OriginalReply0
SolidityNewbievip
· 01-03 15:54
$70 million wasted? Now that's true resolve, much better than those self-deceiving project teams.
View OriginalReply0
AirdropBuffetvip
· 01-03 15:43
$70 million wasted? It would be better to just airdrop to the community; at least users can feel the love.
View OriginalReply0
NFTArtisanHQvip
· 01-03 15:43
honestly, the buyback theater was always just aesthetic posturing... what they're dancing around is actually the real paradigm shift—moving from mechanical reproduction of value to genuine capital provenance through staking architectures. the irony? they're accidentally rediscovering what centuries of financial theory already knew about patience and compound systems.
Reply0
WhaleShadowvip
· 01-03 15:38
$70 million invested without a price increase, now that's outrageous. Staking mechanisms are indeed smarter; users earn rewards and naturally lock their tokens, so there's no need for hard buybacks.
View OriginalReply0
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
English
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)