North American energy dynamics rarely move in straight lines, and the Canadian crude situation proves it. Midwest refineries aren't just set up for Canadian oil—they're practically engineered around it. The pipeline infrastructure, the processing specs, the logistics—you can't just flip a switch and pivot to alternatives overnight. Venezuela's moves barely register as a threat when structural capacity constraints are this entrenched.
Here's the thing: if demand keeps climbing the way most analysts expect, Canada doesn't face contraction—it faces pressure to expand. More supply needed means more investment flowing into Canadian projects. The math is simple. Pipeline-dependent infrastructure doesn't lose value when supply tightens; it becomes more critical.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
19 Likes
Reward
19
5
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
RunWhenCut
· 01-07 04:55
Canada's oil and gas infrastructure is really stuck, it's hard to even change course.
View OriginalReply0
MEVictim
· 01-06 19:04
Canadian oil has locked down the Midwest US refineries, this issue cannot be changed at all.
View OriginalReply0
BankruptWorker
· 01-06 19:02
Canadian oil prices are going up again. Once this infrastructure is finalized, it's dead; no matter how much you want to change it, you can't.
View OriginalReply0
DuskSurfer
· 01-06 18:43
The seller structure is well written, but can Canada really withstand the global energy shift?
View OriginalReply0
DefiOldTrickster
· 01-06 18:39
Hmm... I understand this logic. It's treating Canadian oil and gas as the infrastructure for locked-in returns. When demand tightens, pipeline value soars. Isn't this just a replica of the liquidation mechanism I used to play with on the chain back in the day? Haha
North American energy dynamics rarely move in straight lines, and the Canadian crude situation proves it. Midwest refineries aren't just set up for Canadian oil—they're practically engineered around it. The pipeline infrastructure, the processing specs, the logistics—you can't just flip a switch and pivot to alternatives overnight. Venezuela's moves barely register as a threat when structural capacity constraints are this entrenched.
Here's the thing: if demand keeps climbing the way most analysts expect, Canada doesn't face contraction—it faces pressure to expand. More supply needed means more investment flowing into Canadian projects. The math is simple. Pipeline-dependent infrastructure doesn't lose value when supply tightens; it becomes more critical.