From information acquisition to investment decision-making, the design of this process often determines whether investors can survive in the market. Many people only focus on on-chain data itself but overlook a key point: community discussions, market sentiment, and public opinion can directly shape how these data are presented.
In the current information environment, noise signals account for a very high proportion. What does this mean? It means that having data alone is not enough; more importantly, you need to establish your own information filtering framework and decision-making model.
On-chain data is very real, but real data can also be amplified or suppressed by emotions. Knowing how to separate signal from noise and build an independent analysis system is the core competitiveness for lasting in this market. The most scarce resource in the information age is not data, but judgment.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
19 Likes
Reward
19
7
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
zkProofInThePudding
· 01-08 12:44
That's right, that's why so many people lose money.
View OriginalReply0
TestnetScholar
· 01-07 19:50
That's right, it's all about information overload now. The ones who can truly make money are those who filter out the noise.
Bro, that really hits home. How many people follow the trend and get cut multiple times.
Data doesn't lie, but people do, and that's the biggest trap.
If you don't have a system in place, you're just a target in this market.
Judgment is indeed much more valuable than the data itself. Many people haven't realized this yet.
View OriginalReply0
Anon4461
· 01-07 19:49
To be honest, there's nothing wrong with this view, it's just a bit of a cliché. The key issue is that most people are simply unable to make independent judgments and still follow the crowd by looking at K-line charts.
View OriginalReply0
IronHeadMiner
· 01-07 19:49
Alright, alright, it's the same old spiel. The argument is correct, but I've heard it too many times.
No matter how genuine the data is, it’s useless. The key is who sets the rhythm; retail investors are always the ones getting cut.
That’s a very nice way to put it, but how many people can really do it? I, for one, can’t keep up.
High signal-to-noise ratio? Honestly, it just means there's too much information and not enough brainpower.
Building your own framework? Ha, first you need capital to survive until that day.
It sounds like it’s asking us to strain our brains, but really, it’s just self-rescue. No problem.
View OriginalReply0
BridgeTrustFund
· 01-07 19:40
It sounds like learning to discern information is essential, but to be honest, most people simply can't do it.
View OriginalReply0
SelfStaking
· 01-07 19:38
It sounds a bit like nonsense, but indeed many people still haven't understood this principle after being scammed.
View OriginalReply0
DegenWhisperer
· 01-07 19:28
Data can be deceiving, but emotions can deceive even more... I have been influenced by FOMO in the group multiple times to chase trades.
From information acquisition to investment decision-making, the design of this process often determines whether investors can survive in the market. Many people only focus on on-chain data itself but overlook a key point: community discussions, market sentiment, and public opinion can directly shape how these data are presented.
In the current information environment, noise signals account for a very high proportion. What does this mean? It means that having data alone is not enough; more importantly, you need to establish your own information filtering framework and decision-making model.
On-chain data is very real, but real data can also be amplified or suppressed by emotions. Knowing how to separate signal from noise and build an independent analysis system is the core competitiveness for lasting in this market. The most scarce resource in the information age is not data, but judgment.