Privacy DeFi has recently introduced a new solution worth paying attention to. The main idea is as follows: during on-chain interactions, users' input data, contract states, and execution processes are protected and not fully exposed.



But there is a key point here — it is not a purely anonymous solution. What does that mean? It means that trading counterparts can be identified, and information can be disclosed according to policy requirements when necessary. This finds a balance between privacy protection and regulatory compliance.

In simple terms, it uses proof mechanisms to verify the authenticity of transactions, allowing users to enjoy privacy protection without being completely outside regulatory oversight. This approach could serve as a good reference for DeFi projects aiming for compliant operation.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 5
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
TokenCreatorOPvip
· 6h ago
So this is about wanting to have both fish and bear paws—can privacy and compliance truly be balanced? --- Honestly, there’s still a need to leave a backdoor; regulators will never really let go. --- Wow, that sounds like a good idea, but I’m afraid the actual implementation might be another story. --- Wait, if the trading counterparties can be identified, doesn’t that mean privacy protection is compromised? --- Compliance DeFi sounds like a joke, but these days, you can’t avoid cooperation. --- Are the proof mechanisms reliable? I always feel there are loopholes. --- If this plan can be truly implemented, that’s a win; anyway, most of those previous promises ended in failure. --- Not completely outside regulatory oversight sounds awkward; then what’s the point of privacy? --- Finally, someone is thinking about this. The previous approaches were either too radical or too conservative. --- May I ask when regulatory requirements will change? It feels like we’ll never keep up with the pace.
View OriginalReply0
WhaleStalkervip
· 14h ago
Isn't this just trying to have the best of both worlds? But honestly, that's a bit of nonsense. Can privacy and regulation really be perfectly balanced? I doubt it. It still feels like it's tailored for big capital; what about retail investors? Want both privacy and compliance, but in the end, there's no privacy at all. The proof mechanism sounds good, but who will verify it? Centralized entities? If this really gets implemented, Monero will be directly rendered obsolete. Feels like they're opening a backdoor for certain institutions. Compliance DeFi? Isn't it just that the flavor of DeFi is becoming less and less?
View OriginalReply0
GateUser-00be86fcvip
· 01-07 19:50
This balance point sounds good, but it still feels a bit like a chicken and egg situation... Can privacy and compliance really be achieved simultaneously?
View OriginalReply0
RetroHodler91vip
· 01-07 19:42
Now everything's good, privacy and compliance can finally shake hands? Sounds like they're walking a tightrope.
View OriginalReply0
SmartContractPhobiavip
· 01-07 19:36
Is this another "both-and" approach, where privacy and compliance can truly be achieved simultaneously? It always feels a bit like trying to please everyone.
View OriginalReply0
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
English
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)