2026-01-07 21:27:38

Regarding the market performance of a certain project's spot listing, it's worth a deep analysis of the underlying chip flow.

The selling pressure that emerged in the early stages of listing mainly comes from two forces: one is early supporters or institutional participants of the project who sell immediately upon the spot listing, which is a typical "profit-taking"; the other is retail investors who lack confidence in the project's prospects and quickly cut losses and exit. The combination of these two selling pressures indeed creates a clear downward selling pattern.

However, this process is essentially a redistribution of chips. As these floating chips are gradually absorbed by large investors or institutions, the market's chip structure will gradually stabilize. Personally, I remained cautiously bearish when the project first launched, but once the initial selling pressure is fully released and trading volume begins to shrink, it may instead become a new observation window. After all, an increase in chip concentration often breeds the possibilities for the next phase.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

14 Likes

Reward
14
7
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

SilentObserver

· 20h ago

It's the same old story, let's see how much it can hit.

View OriginalReply0

TerraNeverForget

· 01-09 21:39

It's the same old dumping routine again, retail investors are always the first to rush in as the bagholders. Institutions have already run away, and we're still analyzing the chip flow. Is this time really different? I doubt it. Look at the trading volume, don't just listen to stories. Are floating chips being absorbed? Ha, that term sounds so familiar. The moment of face-slapping often comes right after "stability." Concentrated chips are actually more dangerous, dare to say otherwise?

View OriginalReply0

AirdropHunter007

· 01-07 21:57

It's the same old story of good news being used to dump and wipe out retail investors while big players take the profits. Floating supply being absorbed? When will that happen? I feel like it still needs to drop further. Is increased concentration of chips the next wave of market movement? Alright, I'll just watch for now. I've seen this kind of project get dumped right after launch so many times, there's really nothing new about it. The key is to see when trading volume can finally pick up and become active.

View OriginalReply0

GateUser-e19e9c10

· 01-07 21:55

It's the same old story again, big players accumulating, retail investors getting squeezed out, then saying they need to "observe the window"... I'm tired of hearing this rhetoric. It just launched and already crashed like this, is the story of institutions stepping in really that beautiful? To put it nicely, it's about concentrated chips, but isn't it just waiting for the next round of harvesting? This time the selling pressure is so intense, is it really just "positive news being realized"? Feels like there's a lot more beneath the surface. Wait, you say that shrinking trading volume is an opportunity? Doesn't that just mean no one wants it anymore?

View OriginalReply0

MetaverseVagabond

· 01-07 21:54

Is it that same explanation again... institutions dump the market and call it "reallocation of chips"? Early participants taking losses deserve it, retail investors get cut and still have to speak well of them? Wait, is the shrinking trading volume really the bottom, or has everyone already left? If I had known it would drop after launch, why wait for the "observation window"? Isn't it better to just buy the dip directly? Concentrated chips often signal the beginning of the market maker's move. Can we not have a sickle this time... It feels like every time it's said like this, and then nothing more happens.

View OriginalReply0

ApeWithAPlan

· 01-07 21:49

It's the same old story again. Wait, how do you confirm that the big players are really absorbing? I think it's just mutual cutting of losses. When they dump the market, they say it's reallocation of chips. This logic... feels a bit familiar. Can shrinking trading volume also be a bullish signal? To me, it just looks like no one wants it. Has the selling pressure from earlier been fully released? Uh... it's only been two weeks of decline, is that enough? Basically, it's still a gamble that the big players will take the buy-in, but how many actually win the gamble?

View OriginalReply0

GateUser-c802f0e8

· 01-07 21:44

It's the same old rhetoric again, does increased chip concentration mean the next wave of rise? I've heard it too many times. Sounds good, but actually it's just big players eating the meat and retail investors drinking the soup. Wait, is the selling pressure really enough this time? Feels like it's still being cut. Instead of studying chip flow, wouldn't it be better to look at the project's fundamentals? Previously bearish, now you're talking about possibilities? I feel like you're just storytelling. Betting on both sides of the coin, huh? The kind that guarantees no loss. Shrinking trading volume is actually a new opportunity; this logic is a bit absurd. Early buyers have already run away; who dares to buy the dip this time?

View OriginalReply0