2026-01-07 22:21:42

The native token WAL of the Walrus protocol plays multiple roles within the ecosystem. Starting from staking, participants can obtain delegation rights by locking up WAL tokens. These tokens not only drive the reward distribution mechanism but also support the entire payment system of the storage network, while also holding voting power in protocol governance decisions.

For storage node operators, WAL staking is a prerequisite for participating in the network. Only nodes that have completed token staking can register and become eligible to participate in storing blobs data. This design ensures the economic commitment of nodes, making participants responsible for their actions.

However, it should be noted that the staked tokens are not entirely risk-free. If a node fails to meet the protocol's specified availability standards or does not pass verification mechanisms, it risks having its staked tokens forfeited. This penalty mechanism safeguards network security and encourages storage nodes to maintain stable service quality.

WAL10.47%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

10 Likes

Reward
10
6
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

LucidSleepwalker

· 1h ago

Staking involves taking on risks; there are no risk-free returns... This mechanism essentially ties node interests to network security, making it quite rigid.

View OriginalReply0

MoonMathMagic

· 17h ago

Staking is a double-edged sword; while it can earn you money, you also have to stay alert at all times for fear of penalties and confiscation. After all the fuss, it still comes down to the operator's responsibility—one disconnection and you're completely wiped out. The WAL logic is actually okay, but the key is that the nodes need to be stable—that's the real challenge. This set of penalty mechanisms sounds intimidating, but it's mainly to prevent people from being lazy to save costs. Multiple roles sound impressive, but honestly, it's just the old routine of staking plus penalties. Why can't there be a buffer period for nodes? Instant penalties are just too harsh. The staking threshold is set here, so retail investors basically have no chance. With such high stability requirements, how can small nodes even operate?

View OriginalReply0

SignatureLiquidator

· 01-07 22:48

Talking about stable service quality sounds nice, but in reality, it's just fear of node跑路, the old trick of cutting leeks.

View OriginalReply0

WalletDoomsDay

· 01-07 22:44

It sounds like WAL's staking design is quite tough; if you're not careful, you'll end up losing money. --- If the nodes truly lack stability and get penalized with token confiscation, that's a huge loss. --- Staking + penalty mechanisms—this combo really forces everyone to work hard. --- Basically, it's using real money to ensure network security, which is quite particular. --- Why does this mode feel a bit like a copy of PoS... but multi-chain storage really does need to be handled this way. --- I just want to know how the penalty standards are actually set—will they be particularly strict?

View OriginalReply0

ConfusedWhale

· 01-07 22:36

Staking locked assets, and still getting penalized if something goes wrong? This risk model is a bit harsh... But on the other hand, only then can truly reliable nodes be filtered out.

View OriginalReply0

LiquidityHunter

· 01-07 22:22

I saw this at 3 a.m., and WAL's staking mechanism is indeed quite interesting... The participation threshold is set high enough, but it's a bit unfortunate that there is no detailed data on the risk of confiscation. I want to see what the historical confiscation rate has been.

View OriginalReply0