I took a walk around the square and found that many people actually lack trading ability at all. Their operation process is very consistent: open the candlestick chart, think through a few ideas in their mind, and then go all-in. As for whether they understand the market trend or the reasons behind it—it's probably not even important.



A truly reliable trader must do this: hold at least two sets of methodologies to verify their judgments against each other. Without this cross-checking process, you don't deserve to place an order. Because with one method, you'll never know when it will fail, and the risk is always hanging over your head. Accounts like this will eventually fail, it's that simple.

The same applies to this wave of ETH market. To make money from it, you must first establish your trading logic, not just rely on feelings. Multi-angle verification, understanding where the risks are—that's what makes a trader last longer.
ETH-1.14%
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 10
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
BTCRetirementFundvip
· 01-08 15:48
That's right, the people around me are really just gambling on charts, blaming the market when they lose. Trading based on gut feeling is just giving away money; sooner or later, your account will blow up. The rapid rise and fall of ETH this time is indeed unlogical, and those who don't understand it won't last long. Actually, most people just lack a validated methodology; relying on a single mindset is too dangerous. I've seen quite a few accounts disappear like that—just a quick glance at the chart and going all in. Trading requires using multiple tools to cross-verify; otherwise, it's just gambling. There are many who go all-in, but only those who truly understand risk control are the ones making money.
View OriginalReply0
HypotheticalLiquidatorvip
· 01-08 02:18
The all-in crowd will eventually be liquidated, and there's no denying that. Once the risk control threshold is broken, it leads to a chain of liquidations, leaving no way back.
View OriginalReply0
OnchainUndercovervip
· 01-07 23:51
That's right, the people around me are exactly like that. As soon as the candlestick chart opens, their brains shut down and they just go all in, completely unaware of what they're doing. I have a deep understanding of how two different methodologies validate each other. Relying on just one approach is really too risky; with poor risk awareness, your account could be gone in an instant. I'm also watching ETH this round. It feels like there are still too many gambler mentalities in the market, and truly skilled traders are very few.
View OriginalReply0
DAOdreamervip
· 01-07 23:50
Wake up, most people are just gamblers, not traders at all. The all-in crowd really should listen; cross-validating two sets of methodologies is a good idea. Feels like the market will blow up sooner or later, and this wave of ETH is no exception. Placing orders without doing homework will eventually teach you a lesson from the market. Validating your logic is the prerequisite for survival; everything else is nonsense.
View OriginalReply0
alpha_leakervip
· 01-07 23:48
All-in players don't last more than three months, I agree with this wave. That's right, but only a few people can stick to two sets of methodologies for validation. Right now, it's about who can hold their nerve and not move; it seems like everyone placing orders is losing money. This comment hits hard. Those in the square are indeed all gambler's mentality. Multi-angle validation? Most people don't even have a better first methodology.
View OriginalReply0
LiquidityWizardvip
· 01-07 23:47
Shouha guys are around every day, and those who live long are indeed rare. There's nothing wrong with that statement.
View OriginalReply0
gas_guzzlervip
· 01-07 23:38
To be honest, those people in the square really have a gambler's mentality; as soon as the K-line opens, they jump in without thinking about why. Logic is something, if not built properly, you'll just be a target. I used to be like that too, and now I have painful lessons learned. Having two verification systems is indeed standard; otherwise, it will blow up sooner or later, no discussion.
View OriginalReply0
BearMarketSurvivorvip
· 01-07 23:32
That's right, I've seen too many people put everything on one idea, then their accounts go to zero and they still cry about it. Cross-validating two sets of methodologies is indeed the ultimate, but I'm afraid most people don't have a complete set at all. ETH this round is indeed easy to fall into traps; many are still trading based on intuition. Placing orders without clear logic is just asking for trouble. Really, traders who last long do it this way, not relying on luck.
View OriginalReply0
TeacherDuvip
· 01-07 23:26
No, I look at the candlestick chart and consider one method, then think twice in my mind and consider two methods, so I have three methodologies😅
View OriginalReply0
View More
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
English
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)