Gate Square “Creator Certification Incentive Program” — Recruiting Outstanding Creators!
Join now, share quality content, and compete for over $10,000 in monthly rewards.
How to Apply:
1️⃣ Open the App → Tap [Square] at the bottom → Click your [avatar] in the top right.
2️⃣ Tap [Get Certified], submit your application, and wait for approval.
Apply Now: https://www.gate.com/questionnaire/7159
Token rewards, exclusive Gate merch, and traffic exposure await you!
Details: https://www.gate.com/announcements/article/47889
In early 2026, a trial held at the Federal Court in Manhattan, New York, drew the attention of the crypto community. Behind this case lies a often-overlooked theme: how sovereign nations are using crypto assets to bypass international financial sanctions.
The main figure involved was once one of the most radical promoters of cryptocurrency experiments globally. As early as 2018, this politician pushed forward a bold innovation—launching crypto assets pegged to commodities, attempting to circumvent the US dollar settlement system. This move caused a sensation at the time because it signaled an important message: participants in traditional financial order have begun to consider restructuring value flows using blockchain technology.
Why is this case worth the attention of the crypto market? The answer is straightforward. Essentially, this trial reflects a larger game: in an era of deepening economic blockades, state-level actors are exploring alternative payment systems. Cryptocurrencies, just right, offer such possibilities—transcending geography, not controlled by any single country, and resistant to censorship in value transfer mechanisms.
From a technical perspective, when traditional cross-border payment channels are frozen, blockchain indeed becomes a feasible alternative. This is not science fiction but a reality repeatedly validated through geopolitical conflicts over the past few years. From international trade settlements to capital flight, the liquidity characteristics of crypto assets are increasingly recognized by participants.
At the same time, this also reminds us of a question: in an era of reshaping the global financial system, decentralized assets like Bitcoin will play an increasingly prominent role as stores of value. They are not fully owned by any country, nor can they be unilaterally frozen—this is precisely what many risk asset holders are re-evaluating.
This courtroom battle, in essence, is a collision between the old order and new possibilities. And this collision process is reshaping the flow of global capital and risk-hedging logic.