The degrowth theory falls into a classic thinking trap: premises and conclusions are mutually interchangeable, ultimately evolving into a self-consistent closed loop.



First, there is a dislocation of specificity combined with false certainty — the visions we construct often hover above an abyss of axioms that cannot be explored. These seemingly profound theoretical frameworks, in fact, lack a solid foundational support.

Premises gradually turn into conclusions, and conclusions evolve into action plans. When you wake up from this fever of thought, everything you once believed with unwavering certainty will vanish into thin air. The danger of this circular reasoning is that we mistake imagination for reality and expectations for facts.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 5
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
MelonFieldvip
· 01-09 08:50
Another self-indulgent feast of theories, packaging imagination as truth and selling it to people...
View OriginalReply0
FlashLoanLarryvip
· 01-09 08:49
lol the degrowth thesis reads like a liquidity trap disguised as moral philosophy. circular reasoning maxed out. seen this pattern before in failed protocol governance — axioms become law becomes dogma, nobody questions the basis anymore. same energy as "we must reduce to grow" without modeling actual opportunity costs. tell me how you extract value from a degrowth economy tho
Reply0
DegenRecoveryGroupvip
· 01-09 08:41
Speaking of which, isn't the degrowth theory just taking its assumptions as truth? Premises become conclusions, conclusions become actions, and after going in circles, it's still the same rhetoric—typical self-indulgence.
View OriginalReply0
PaperHandSistervip
· 01-09 08:41
Haha, it's the same logic again. I'm already tired of the degrowth theory; it's just self-deception. Digging your own pit and filling it yourself. This circular reasoning is common in the crypto world. Faith vs. reality can never be broken. Does this kind of thought experiment have any guiding significance for reality? It's just imagination used as sustenance.
View OriginalReply0
AirdropHarvestervip
· 01-09 08:25
To be honest, this set of theories is just a self-indulgent trick, treating assumptions as conclusions and conclusions as facts. In the end, everyone ends up not making any money.
View OriginalReply0
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
English
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)