2026-01-09 09:23:45

The core goal of Tria is very clear: to build a self-custodial on-chain banking system that allows your crypto assets (BTC, stablecoins, etc.) to generate yields continuously and be used for payments at any time, all without the cumbersome process of exchanges.

From an operational perspective, the project focuses on two main scenarios: first, where to allocate assets and how to make them appreciate; second, how to efficiently pay when spending is needed—these are the pain points for traditional crypto users.

It is worth noting the project's underlying technology. Tria introduces BestPath AVS (a set of intent market solutions), designed to make cross-chain operations transparent and seamless for users—you don't need to worry about how routing is handled at the bottom layer, as the system automatically finds the optimal execution path. This approach offers unique advantages in simplifying user experience, especially in multi-chain asset liquidity scenarios.

BTC0,79%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

10 Likes

Reward
10
5
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

SatoshiHeir

· 13h ago

It should be pointed out that the Tria logic is essentially a repackaging of the DeFi self-custody concept. BestPath AVS sounds very fancy, but at its core, it's still the intent-based routing system. However... it does address the real pain point of cross-chain payments, I have to admit.

View OriginalReply0

OnchainGossiper

· 01-09 09:53

Oh wow, so this is the rhythm of taking down CEXs. --- BestPath's approach is indeed interesting; transparent routing—who doesn't love it? --- Self-custody banks? Sounds great, but I'm just worried it's another vaporware project. --- Finally, someone wants to solve these pain points. The exchange fees are really outrageous. --- Cross-chain seamless operation—if it can really be achieved, it will change the game. --- Money making money and being spendable—that logic makes sense. --- Feeling something's off... who bears the risks of self-custody? --- AVS is a new concept again; we’ll have to see how it performs once implemented. --- Asset management and consumption integrated—I'm all for this idea, just worried about the complexity explosion. --- Wait, is this the Web3 version of a financial app?

View OriginalReply0

TokenomicsTinfoilHat

· 01-09 09:51

To be honest, the idea of a self-custody bank sounds good, but the key still depends on the actual yield rate. How much can transaction fees be pushed down? I'm most afraid of these cross-chain black boxes. Automatic routing, in the end, is just slippage, and then you'll have to tinker again. Currently, the pain point still seems to be liquidity. Are there enough counterparties? Aren't we a bit worried that this might be another round of narrative bubble? BestPath sounds fancy, but I don't know how it actually performs in practice. We'll have to wait for mainnet data to tell.

View OriginalReply0

GasFeeCrybaby

· 01-09 09:39

It sounds like an all-in-one solution of self-custody + yield generation + payments, kind of like trying to handle all the headaches of exchanges. I need to see how the automatic routing performs in practice; otherwise, it's just theoretical. With yield generation so competitive now, can Tria's returns hold up? Honestly, cross-chain feels great in theory, but how are gas fees calculated? Is there another round of fee extraction? The biggest concern with self-custody projects like this is security—do they have an audit? It seems useful, but how many people will actually get started using it?

View OriginalReply0

MonkeySeeMonkeyDo

· 01-09 09:38

This idea is not really new, but combining yield generation with payments is indeed somewhat interesting. BestPath's approach depends on how practical it actually is when used. Self-custody sounds great, but what if something really goes wrong... Another cross-chain solution, these projects all fail due to usability issues. The combination of yield generation + payments—if it really works well, I would believe in it. It sounds good, but in reality, execution is usually disappointing. Finally, someone is trying to solve the gas fee problem. I wonder how the security audit is; on-chain banking stuff can't have any issues at all. I'm a bit interested in the routing transparency part—how exactly is it implemented? Another self-custody banking story; I feel like I've heard this term too many times.

View OriginalReply0