#加密货币监管政策 2025 is indeed a pivotal point worth careful consideration. Since Trump took office, the regulatory environment for cryptocurrencies has shifted from "crackdown" to "embrace." This is not just a change in political tone; the underlying economic logic is even more intriguing.

I noticed a detail: the $37 trillion US debt issue is precisely the internal driving force behind the push for stablecoins and digital asset strategies. The play of debt devaluation has been played by the US for decades, but through the stablecoin system, risks can be "exported" to global holders—this is an attempt to scale and increase covert operations.

But this also brings new perspectives to copy-trading strategies: in the context of relaxed regulations and influxes of institutional funds, market sentiment is more easily driven by policy signals, and volatility may actually increase. The epic liquidation on 10.11 is a clear example—caused by a reversal of policy expectations.

Therefore, when choosing copy-trading counterparts now, I focus more on two dimensions: first, the trader’s responsiveness to macro policy changes and risk management capabilities; second, whether their position management considers the market's seemingly stable but actually unstable nature. High leverage looks very profitable during periods of regulatory friendliness, but true experts are those who can decisively cut losses when policies reverse.

The compliant and environmentally friendly market is here, but the cost of greed is often greater. Be cautiously optimistic and always keep some bullets for stop-loss.