Disclaimer: This article is for educational purposes only and does not constitute investment advice.
Why is the transition to DAO an urgent matter?
Cryptocurrency projects are rapidly accelerating their shift to DAOs (Decentralized Autonomous Organizations). This is not just a trend but an essential step toward realizing the fundamental principle of blockchain: “decentralization.” However, reality often differs from the ideal. Many projects face issues such as decision-making stagnation, low voting turnout, and excessive influence from large token holders (“whales”).
As demonstrated by pioneering projects like Decentraland and No NPC Society, transitioning to fully community-managed systems requires a phased approach. The key to success is balancing system stability with community maturity, rather than aiming for complete decentralization from the start.
The role and evolution of governance tokens
The first phase of DAO transition involves introducing governance tokens. In Decentraland, holding MANA or LAND tokens grants users voting rights on protocol changes and community fund allocations. Governance tokens are not just voting tickets; they serve as tools for determining the project’s direction and embodying “democracy.”
In the early stages, founders need to centrally design and implement the system because quick decision-making is crucial for success. However, gradually introducing governance tokens allows this authority to be delegated to the community over time.
Implementation stages and risk management
Reaching full DAO autonomy involves multiple steps:
Stage 1: Advisory voting
Decentraland’s approach started with non-binding “advisory” votes. This allows testing of voting processes and governance mechanisms while minimizing actual protocol risks.
Stage 2: Small parameter updates
Once voting reliability is verified, on-chain voting begins for limited protocol parameters such as fee structures and interest rate adjustments.
Stage 3: Full voting rights
In the final stage, the community gains complete decision-making power over protocol-wide changes and community treasury allocations.
This phased process addresses the reality that the community may still be immature and lack the expertise or structure needed for managing complex protocols.
Immutability and transparency of code
Achieving true decentralization requires codebase immutability—meaning founders cannot make arbitrary changes. Bug fixes, updates, and new features are only implemented with community consensus.
No NPC Society utilizes Solana’s Realms platform to streamline DAO structure and manages funds via transparent multi-signature vaults. This approach allows the founding team to step back and operate on equal footing with community members, enabling the project to grow beyond its creators.
Building an autonomous community treasury
Ensuring DAO sustainability necessitates independent revenue streams. Funds generated through transaction fees, loan interests, and other mechanisms are directly accumulated into the community treasury. Subsequently, the community has the authority to propose and vote on how to allocate these funds.
This setup allows the project to operate and develop sustainably without relying solely on initial funding from the founding team.
Increasing voting participation and dispersing power
One of the main challenges in implementing DAOs is low voter turnout. Many community members are indifferent to the voting process, resulting in a structure where large token holders exert disproportionate influence.
To address this, projects adopt multiple approaches:
Clear proposal structures: Facilitating simple “Yes/No” voting options for community members
Reputation-based governance: Weighing votes based on contribution levels rather than token holdings
Secondary voting mechanisms: Reducing voting weight for large token holders and increasing relative influence for small holders
Path to full power delegation
Transferring code and community treasury management to the community represents the final step in power decentralization. No NPC Society aims to achieve this within six months after private and public token sales through a rapid roadmap.
This delegation ensures that changes are no longer dictated by founders but are executed solely based on community consensus. Distributing power across a large global community significantly enhances the project’s longevity and trustworthiness.
In conclusion
Transitioning to DAO governance is complex and involves overcoming many technical hurdles. Proper timing and a well-established community are prerequisites. However, if a project can delegate its management rights to the community, it marks a decisive milestone in maturity and commitment to decentralization in the crypto space.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
Implementation of DAO Governance: The Reality of Community-Led Power Delegation
Disclaimer: This article is for educational purposes only and does not constitute investment advice.
Why is the transition to DAO an urgent matter?
Cryptocurrency projects are rapidly accelerating their shift to DAOs (Decentralized Autonomous Organizations). This is not just a trend but an essential step toward realizing the fundamental principle of blockchain: “decentralization.” However, reality often differs from the ideal. Many projects face issues such as decision-making stagnation, low voting turnout, and excessive influence from large token holders (“whales”).
As demonstrated by pioneering projects like Decentraland and No NPC Society, transitioning to fully community-managed systems requires a phased approach. The key to success is balancing system stability with community maturity, rather than aiming for complete decentralization from the start.
The role and evolution of governance tokens
The first phase of DAO transition involves introducing governance tokens. In Decentraland, holding MANA or LAND tokens grants users voting rights on protocol changes and community fund allocations. Governance tokens are not just voting tickets; they serve as tools for determining the project’s direction and embodying “democracy.”
In the early stages, founders need to centrally design and implement the system because quick decision-making is crucial for success. However, gradually introducing governance tokens allows this authority to be delegated to the community over time.
Implementation stages and risk management
Reaching full DAO autonomy involves multiple steps:
Stage 1: Advisory voting
Decentraland’s approach started with non-binding “advisory” votes. This allows testing of voting processes and governance mechanisms while minimizing actual protocol risks.
Stage 2: Small parameter updates
Once voting reliability is verified, on-chain voting begins for limited protocol parameters such as fee structures and interest rate adjustments.
Stage 3: Full voting rights
In the final stage, the community gains complete decision-making power over protocol-wide changes and community treasury allocations.
This phased process addresses the reality that the community may still be immature and lack the expertise or structure needed for managing complex protocols.
Immutability and transparency of code
Achieving true decentralization requires codebase immutability—meaning founders cannot make arbitrary changes. Bug fixes, updates, and new features are only implemented with community consensus.
No NPC Society utilizes Solana’s Realms platform to streamline DAO structure and manages funds via transparent multi-signature vaults. This approach allows the founding team to step back and operate on equal footing with community members, enabling the project to grow beyond its creators.
Building an autonomous community treasury
Ensuring DAO sustainability necessitates independent revenue streams. Funds generated through transaction fees, loan interests, and other mechanisms are directly accumulated into the community treasury. Subsequently, the community has the authority to propose and vote on how to allocate these funds.
This setup allows the project to operate and develop sustainably without relying solely on initial funding from the founding team.
Increasing voting participation and dispersing power
One of the main challenges in implementing DAOs is low voter turnout. Many community members are indifferent to the voting process, resulting in a structure where large token holders exert disproportionate influence.
To address this, projects adopt multiple approaches:
Path to full power delegation
Transferring code and community treasury management to the community represents the final step in power decentralization. No NPC Society aims to achieve this within six months after private and public token sales through a rapid roadmap.
This delegation ensures that changes are no longer dictated by founders but are executed solely based on community consensus. Distributing power across a large global community significantly enhances the project’s longevity and trustworthiness.
In conclusion
Transitioning to DAO governance is complex and involves overcoming many technical hurdles. Proper timing and a well-established community are prerequisites. However, if a project can delegate its management rights to the community, it marks a decisive milestone in maturity and commitment to decentralization in the crypto space.