Recently, I have been in-depth researching the storage solutions of the Sui ecosystem and found that a project's technical architecture is indeed worth paying attention to.

Its core innovation lies in adopting the RedStuff two-dimensional erasure coding technology. Compared to traditional storage solutions, how significant is this improvement? For example, to ensure data security, Filecoin requires 25 times redundancy, while this solution only needs 4-5 times, cutting costs by more than 80%. Moreover, during data recovery, there is no need to download the entire file; a single data slice can complete the recovery, reducing bandwidth consumption by at least half.

The architecture design is also very meticulous—layered storage approach, data stored off-chain to ensure capacity, indexes and proofs on-chain to ensure immutability. This not only protects data integrity but also keeps on-chain gas costs extremely low.

Even more impressive is the verification mechanism. Using asynchronous challenge proofs, nodes do not need to be constantly ready to respond to verification requests. The computational overhead for verification is reduced to one-tenth of traditional solutions, directly lowering the operational burden on nodes. No wonder so many nodes are willing to join the ecosystem now.

From the token economy perspective, its design also forms a good closed loop—staking and storage payments both require tokens, and the higher the ecosystem activity, the tighter the token supply becomes. This deep binding relationship can indeed support long-term value. The combination of technical robustness and economic model suggests that the decentralized storage track is indeed nurturing new opportunities.