The administration keeps pushing the narrative around that $2,000 'dividend' proposal, yet when you run the actual numbers with economists, the whole thing falls apart pretty quickly. The fundamentals just don't work out. It's the kind of policy angle that sounds good in headlines but breaks down under real scrutiny. Economists have been pointing out the fiscal math problems—where exactly does the funding come from? How does it scale across the economy? These aren't small questions when you're talking about distributing that kind of capital. For those watching market dynamics and macro trends, this kind of policy uncertainty matters. Unfunded proposals tend to create volatility, whether we're talking about traditional markets or crypto. The disconnect between what's being promised and what's actually feasible keeps generating friction in investor sentiment.