This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
15 Likes
Reward
15
7
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
NeverVoteOnDAO
· 01-09 14:17
Full position betting on geopolitical conflicts, this guy is really daring. Dropped $23,000 just to gamble on a war. That's what the prediction market is all about.
View OriginalReply0
BearMarketSurvivor
· 01-09 11:21
Full position betting on geopolitical conflicts, these two really dare to do it. The new wallet is directly all in—either insider information or pure gambler mentality.
View OriginalReply0
NFTRegretter
· 01-09 11:20
Full position betting on war, this guy really has guts. With only $23,000, he dares to do this?
A new wallet comes in and goes all in—either he's a genius or a fool, there's no middle ground.
Predicting the market is like gambling; political risk is the hardest to calculate. This guy is probably going to suffer.
Two new wallets teaming up to throw money around? Feels like there's some insider information...
A war before 2026? Sounds ridiculous, but on-chain gamblers have never lacked imagination.
I really don't understand this kind of play. Why use coins to bet on geopolitics?
View OriginalReply0
RugpullAlertOfficer
· 01-09 11:19
Hmm... 23,000 dollars betting on "Israel attacking Iran," new wallets going all-in? This confidence is really enough, either insiders or gamblers' mentality.
---
All-in on geopolitical risks, quite bold. I don't have that kind of guts.
---
Wait, why is the new wallet so eager? Although the stake isn't big, the attitude is very aggressive.
---
The prediction market is starting to play political gambling again. They really dare to bet on anything.
---
Two new wallets teaming up with 23,000, is it information asymmetry or just throwing a tantrum? On-chain data is quite interesting here.
---
Going all-in directly... My goodness, how confident do you have to be to do this?
---
Honestly, it still depends on how reality unfolds. Prediction markets are essentially just a game of hot potato.
---
The new wallet is so confident. Did they get some inside information in advance?
View OriginalReply0
ser_we_are_ngmi
· 01-09 11:16
Going all-in on this kind of geopolitical play? Bro really thinks he can predict the global situation perfectly.
Just all-in betting on war. I told you the new wallet has some potential.
$23,000 bet on 2026. If it really blows up, these two guys will get rich, but it doesn't seem that likely.
This is the madness of prediction markets. Who can really be accurate?
If the new wallet dares to play like this, it's either insider information or a gambler's mindset.
View OriginalReply0
SwapWhisperer
· 01-09 11:07
Two new wallets are directly fully staking on geopolitical conflicts. Are they betting on their information advantage or just throwing a tantrum?
View OriginalReply0
GasGuru
· 01-09 10:54
Full position betting on geopolitical conflicts. These new wallets are really bold, but that's the charm of the prediction market.
If new wallets dare to do this, it shows they truly have confidence in their judgment of the situation, not just playing around.
$23,000 may not be a huge amount, but with a full position stance, either they genuinely believe or they have a gambler's mentality, haha.
Let's see how it unfolds by the end of January next year. Interesting.
2.3万美元豪赌:新钱包押注地缘冲突走向
【区块律动】有趣的是,最近两个新建立的钱包用户动作够快——他们联合砸下2.3万美元,在预测市场上押注一个大胆的政治赌注:「以色列会在2026年1月31日前对伊朗发动军事行动」。从链上数据来看,这笔资金进出虽然不算巨大,但新钱包直接满仓参与,姿态还是很坚定的。这种小额但专注的赌注模式,通常暗示参与者对自己的判断有信心。当然,预测市场本身就是信息博弈,这笔钱最后的归属还得看现实如何演进。