Recently, a new interesting phenomenon has emerged in the crypto world— a meme coin successfully made its debut on a major exchange. Even more dramatic is that the founder of this coin holds 39.2% of the circulating supply, which is quite a significant share.
Honestly, seeing such a holding structure, many people have started to wonder: with the founder holding so many tokens, is there a risk of a dump in the future? After all, in the crypto market, the founder's holding ratio has always been a key indicator for investors. From historical experience, highly concentrated holdings often imply greater potential for price volatility.
But from another perspective, being listed on a top-tier exchange itself indicates that the project has passed a fairly rigorous review process. This at least sends a signal: the market still recognizes the project's fundamentals. Whether the founder will dump later depends on the project's actual operations and community consensus.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
17 Likes
Reward
17
7
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
TopEscapeArtist
· 4h ago
39.2%? Bro, isn't this just a ticking time bomb? Looking at the technicals, the MACD is almost losing momentum.
View OriginalReply0
LiquidityNinja
· 4h ago
39.2%? This founder really has a big nerve, directly holding the power to dump the market.
View OriginalReply0
AirdropHunterXM
· 4h ago
39.2%? That ratio is a bit questionable; it depends on how to proceed later.
View OriginalReply0
DiamondHands
· 4h ago
39.2%? That's an outrageous ratio. Still daring to list on top-tier exchanges.
Wait, crashing the market is just a matter of time, isn't it?
Approval from top-tier exchanges does not equal a project being reliable. Don't be too naive.
Meme coins are basically gambling. The founder's holdings... I think I'll stay on the sidelines.
It's another routine of cutting leeks; I've seen it too many times.
What does listing on top-tier exchanges prove? It only shows that exchanges also want to make money.
With this level of concentration, a single news can instantly crash the price to the ground.
I wouldn't dare to touch such coins; the risk is too high.
View OriginalReply0
GasFeeCrier
· 4h ago
39.2%? Bro, isn't this just a warning sign of a rug pull...
Wait, is it on a top-tier exchange? Then it might really be different.
Whether they dump or not depends on the operation, but I definitely wouldn't dare to touch it.
View OriginalReply0
just_another_fish
· 4h ago
39.2% Still dare to go to the top? Are you crazy
---
Another prelude story of a founder cutting the leeks
---
Getting on the exchange can be whitewashed? I don't think so
---
All meme coins are like this, sooner or later they will crash, don't you have a sense of proportion
---
The review of top exchanges is just so-so
---
Trust what fundamentals? Trust the founder’s conscience?
---
Waiting to see the follow-up, anyway I don’t dare to touch this kind
---
39.2%... I can smell the smell of copper
---
Community consensus? Nice words, but it’s all about how the whales move
---
This is the fate of meme coins, a mess of feathers
View OriginalReply0
BearMarketSunriser
· 4h ago
39.2% directly broke the mentality, this ratio is just too outrageous
Recently, a new interesting phenomenon has emerged in the crypto world— a meme coin successfully made its debut on a major exchange. Even more dramatic is that the founder of this coin holds 39.2% of the circulating supply, which is quite a significant share.
Honestly, seeing such a holding structure, many people have started to wonder: with the founder holding so many tokens, is there a risk of a dump in the future? After all, in the crypto market, the founder's holding ratio has always been a key indicator for investors. From historical experience, highly concentrated holdings often imply greater potential for price volatility.
But from another perspective, being listed on a top-tier exchange itself indicates that the project has passed a fairly rigorous review process. This at least sends a signal: the market still recognizes the project's fundamentals. Whether the founder will dump later depends on the project's actual operations and community consensus.