Chasing every L2 rollout isn't the play. Compliance theater won't achieve real scale. Forcing into established ecosystems? That door stays tough.



The real strategy? Focus on what's underserved.

Governments moving onchain need infrastructure purpose-built for institutional complexity—systems designed to handle regulatory nuance, operational friction, and the governance layers that matter at scale.

When sovereign entities tokenize operations, trust becomes the bottleneck. A chain architected for that specific gravity wins.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 5
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
FrogInTheWellvip
· 4m ago
Speaking the core truth, not following the trend to chase L2 is the way to stay clear-headed. The government going on-chain is indeed a huge blue ocean; whoever first establishes the trust layer will win.
View OriginalReply0
EthSandwichHerovip
· 6h ago
This logic makes sense, but essentially it's about finding a blue ocean track. Government chains are indeed the future direction.
View OriginalReply0
ContractBugHuntervip
· 6h ago
Layer 2 rollups are not interesting; we still need to find a truly blank market.
View OriginalReply0
OnChainSleuthvip
· 6h ago
NGL, government on-chain is indeed a blue ocean, but if the architecture design is wrong, it's all pointless.
View OriginalReply0
GasBankruptervip
· 6h ago
Layer 2 is not interesting; you have to build the government's infrastructure to succeed.
View OriginalReply0
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
English
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)