Traditional IPOs are like private parties only large institutions can attend—investment banks, auditing firms, and big funds get the tickets, while retail investors can only wait to buy in at high prices on the secondary market. If we transplant this model onto blockchain, can it become something that everyone can see clearly, yet still protect their privacy? This isn't just a matter of swapping out databases; it requires finding a balance between regulatory frameworks and privacy protection.



The solution Dusk will deliver by the end of 2025 revolves around this core issue.

Looking back now, RWA has evolved from a conceptual idea into a supporting pillar of DeFi. The question is, why are major companies like Apple, Tesla, or certain unicorns still not directly raising funds on-chain? Technology isn't the main bottleneck; the real hurdles are two conflicting demands: one side requires compliance with global financial regulations, while the other side demands the protection of trade secrets and privacy.

Opting for full transparency, like Ethereum, would expose all large institution's building actions and business information. But going the anonymous route would directly cross the red lines of financial regulation in various countries. This deadlock seems unsolvable, and Dusk’s technical breakthrough lies here—it offers a sophisticated mechanism called Piecrust to address this tough problem.

Why is Dusk capable of bringing IPOs onto the chain? Let's start with the identity verification protocol Citadel. Simply put, its role is to allow you to prove compliance with regulatory requirements without revealing all your cards. Imagine a verification system that can confirm your legal identity and credentials while selectively hiding specific details—institutional investors can prove their identity and qualifications without exposing their business plans or funding chains to competitors.

This mechanism has significant practical value. For example, a leading exchange wanting to issue derivatives or initiate fundraising on-chain must pass regulatory identity checks while preventing sensitive information leaks. Citadel’s design is tailored for such scenarios. When combined with Piecrust, a privacy-preserving computation layer, transactions and fundraising activities can be conducted in a controlled, auditable manner, while still safeguarding participant privacy.

The real value of this combination lies in breaking a deadlock: previously, it was either full transparency (risk exposure) or full anonymity (regulatory red line). Now, a feasible third way exists between the two. For RWA development, this means that bringing real-world assets onto the chain is no longer a binary choice of "do nothing" or "fully expose."

By the end of 2025, the market’s need for such solutions will grow increasingly urgent. As RWA scales up, balancing compliance and privacy will become a key factor in attracting traditional large institutions. Dusk’s technological approach, to some extent, represents a possible direction—maintaining the advantages of on-chain transparency while providing participants with enough privacy space.
DUSK-1.3%
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 6
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
BrokenYieldvip
· 8h ago
nah the "third way" narrative is the oldest play in the book... watched too many protocols promise the compliance-privacy sweet spot only to get regulatory hammered anyway lol
Reply0
ChainSpyvip
· 11h ago
Honestly, this is the deadlock of on-chain financing... Whether it's transparency or privacy, both are dead ends. Major institutions have long gone on-chain, but the real bottleneck is still that old-fashioned regulatory framework. Citadel's logic sounds good, but I'm just worried it might be another "perfect solution" that falls flat when implemented. If RWA can truly take off, then technologies like Dusk need to first break the market's confidence crisis. Controllable auditing sounds great, but the question is, who defines "controllable"? It still depends on the approval of regulatory authorities in various countries. It feels more like dressing up traditional finance with a Web3 coat; the essence hasn't changed. Why does it seem like crypto people are always trying to evade regulation rather than genuinely embracing it? The third path sounds appealing, but in reality, it remains to be seen how many regulatory agencies will approve it.
View OriginalReply0
LayerZeroEnjoyervip
· 11h ago
This is the real breakthrough, finally someone has thought of this balance point. Dusk's recent moves are indeed impressive. To put it simply, they want both the cake and to eat it too—that's what Web3 should be doing. Wait, can this set of tools really bring giants like Tesla onto the blockchain? I'm a bit skeptical. Privacy computing layers sound awesome, but how practical are they? Compliance and privacy are inherently contradictory; can Dusk truly coordinate them? Finally, I understand why major institutions have been watching from the sidelines—the core issue lies here. But on the other hand, the name Piecrust is really outrageous haha. It feels like they're playing a game of Tai Chi between centralization and decentralization—can it work? It reveals a truth: the bottleneck of on-chain financing is not in technology.
View OriginalReply0
gm_or_ngmivip
· 11h ago
The real challenge has never been technology, but the game of利益集团 (interest groups). Dusk's approach is indeed impressive, but will major institutions really use it? It depends on how regulators play their cards. The third way sounds great, but will its actual implementation just be empty talk? This is the right direction for RWA—transparent but not fully exposed, smart. Not bad, at least someone is thinking about real issues, not just piling up technology. Whether it succeeds or not depends on practical applications in 2026; don't just dream with PPT slides. Privacy and compliance are inherently opposed; finding a balance is already quite good. Still believe that traditional institutions face huge barriers to entering, even with Citadel involved. Well said, IPOs are a privilege game; can blockchain change that? Not necessarily. If this set of solutions can truly break through, RWA will have hope.
View OriginalReply0
NotFinancialAdvicevip
· 11h ago
In simple terms, it's about walking a tightrope between regulation and privacy. It sounds good, but what's the reality? The only ones who can truly change the game are big institutions willing to go on-chain. Right now, everyone is still watching and hesitating. Citadel's approach feels like it's just giving traditional finance a new lease on life, with a different disguise. The RWA concept has been hyped for so long, but which projects have actually been implemented? Don't tell me it's just talk on paper again. How many people understand privacy computing? Dusk is on the right track, but whether the market will buy into it is still uncertain. It feels like solving a problem that was artificially created; regulators never really want transparency. I've heard this logic countless times—new technology, new balance, new hope. And in the end? Compromise solutions usually leave everyone dissatisfied. Can this time be different? Betting on Dusk or betting on the market?
View OriginalReply0
DAOTruantvip
· 11h ago
Finally, someone has explained this deadlock clearly. IPO on the chain is either a technical issue or a political one. The third way sounds appealing, but does Apple really have the guts to go fully on-chain? I remain skeptical. Can Dusk's Citadel+Piecrust withstand regulation? That’s the real test. Compliance and privacy are always at odds; a perfect balance is impossible. That said, if RWA truly takes off, big institutions will inevitably come in. It depends on whether Dusk can become the key to this threshold.
View OriginalReply0
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
English
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)