Recently, $DUSK's performance has indeed been disappointing. Contract operations have resulted in several hundred USD in losses, and when trying to recover the losses, I ended up going all-in and losing over a hundred. The whole process has really affected my mindset.



Interestingly, this is not just a personal issue. Now, more and more people are participating in various marketplace tasks, and competition is becoming increasingly fierce. Sometimes, looking at those participants, I really get the feeling of "is it really necessary," and I even considered giving up altogether.

But after calming down and thinking about it, the logic behind the DUSK project itself is still clear. As the first compliant privacy public chain compatible with EVM, its positioning targets institutional funds and the RWA track — this is not a small market. The project has solved the contradiction between privacy protection and audit transparency through its innovative ZK technology, which is indeed a highlight at the technical level. Moreover, 300 million euros of real assets have already been implemented, showing that it’s not just an empty dream.

From an infrastructure perspective, such a project is indeed seriously underestimated by the market. So the problem may not lie in the project itself, but in everyone’s mindset — being too eager for quick gains and only focusing on short-term fluctuations. If you believe in long-term value, isn’t it unnecessary to be so competitive?
DUSK-5.36%
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 7
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
fren_with_benefitsvip
· 4h ago
Losing your mind and still analyzing the fundamentals, I suggest you go to sleep first. --- Going all-in to recover a loss of over a hundred? Brother, that's the gambler's mentality. No matter how good DUSK is, it can't save this. --- 3 billion euros sounds impressive, but your few hundred U's are all for nothing if you lose them. --- Everyone talks about long-term value, but no one can withstand short-term bankruptcy, that's just how it is. --- Instead of fighting over the marketplace tasks, it's better to check your risk control, really. --- Undervalued? Then why did it fall? Simply put, no one wants it. --- EVM compatibility, ZK technology, RWA track... No matter how reliable they sound, they can't change the fact that you're currently trapped. --- Stop convincing yourself, cutting losses is the real deal. Mindset is something retail investors can't afford to play with.
View OriginalReply0
ParanoiaKingvip
· 4h ago
Recovering losses is really a gambler's mentality... The chance of a all-in comeback isn't even higher than buying a lottery ticket. Long-term logic is fine, but short-term heavy losses are also real, which is quite awkward. The plaza tasks are so competitive... Can't beat the robots and studios.
View OriginalReply0
staking_grampsvip
· 4h ago
Going all-in and losing over a hundred? Bro, you need to adjust your mindset. As long as the fundamentals of DUSK haven't collapsed, don't follow the crash.
View OriginalReply0
YieldChaservip
· 4h ago
Going all-in lost over a hundred... Brother, you need to adjust your mindset. Chasing losses is the easiest way to get into trouble. Trying to recover losses with this routine is deadly; the more you think like that, the deeper you get. The project logic is clear, but when your mindset collapses, even the best logic is useless. But on the other hand, RWA is indeed the future, and DUSK has a pretty good position. That group of people doing plaza tasks... they really might be overdoing it, what are they trying to achieve? The real assets worth 300 million euros being realized is quite interesting, not just air coins. Mindset is more important than choosing coins, maybe take a couple of weeks to cool down and then reassess. Stop going all-in, really. Acting on impulse is the most expensive.
View OriginalReply0
CryptoGoldminevip
· 4h ago
Short-term all-in risks are indeed high, but looking at DUSK's ZK architecture and RWA layout, this wave might be the low-cost computing window for accumulation. From the perspective of computing power returns, institutional-level privacy public chain infrastructure is not so easily replicable. Real assets worth 300 million euros are not just talk; the investment return cycle should be viewed this way. Don't get too caught up in short-term fluctuations; focusing on improving investment efficiency is the right path. The biggest fear is chasing highs and taking over positions; it's not the time to force low-cost accumulation. If you can't generate good returns by forcing it, it's better to stay patient and wait for the difficulty adjustment period.
View OriginalReply0
LadderToolGuyvip
· 4h ago
I've also been through the moment of recovering losses, really just sacrificing myself. But DUSK's privacy public chain logic is indeed decent, with 300 million euros worth of RWA implementation right there... The dream was interrupted before it was finished by the market.
View OriginalReply0
TokenomicsPolicevip
· 4h ago
Chasing losses and going all-in instead—I've seen this move many times. Even if your mindset collapses, the key is to distinguish whether the project is bad or if your own operations are poor.
View OriginalReply0
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
English
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)