Looking back at this wave of market movement, the analysis logic of support and resistance levels has been basically validated— the resistance zone was completely broken through, and there was no expected breakout and pullback. Instead, the closing price continued to stay above the resistance level.



From the perspective of going long at 90400, rising to 93400 yields a 3000-point profit, and taking profit is a rational choice. Breaking through 94300 satisfies the conditions for a right-side long position, pushing all the way to 97000, which is also nearly a 3000-point profit margin. The market actually provided very clear signals.

But what's interesting is that some traders rush to open short positions without seeing a confirmed breakout and pullback, and stubbornly refuse to cut losses. This issue has actually been emphasized repeatedly— when the closing price is above the resistance zone, short positions are inherently problematic, and one should consider stopping loss immediately, or even reversing to go long. Setting stop-loss is just a matter of a few points, but the result is a big loss due to overconfidence.

This round of market movement, from the bottom support zone at 90400 to multiple entries at 93400, and then the opening conditions at 94300 and 93400, the logic is all laid out here. If there's anything you don't understand, is it better to communicate the problem promptly? $BTC
BTC4.24%
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 4
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
FundingMartyrvip
· 4h ago
The market signals are so clear, yet you still open short positions in the opposite direction. Truly, you're just fighting yourself. Luck-driven psychology really can ruin you. Isn't it better to cut losses early? Holding onto short positions above the resistance level—this logic, I really don't understand. Repeatedly testing the ceiling around 95,000 indicates how fierce the bulls are. Not cutting losses is like betting on the market turning around, and the result is being taught a lesson. Really, communicate your thoughts in time, don't keep it all inside.
View OriginalReply0
quietly_stakingvip
· 4h ago
Oh my, I got trapped again, this is the consequence of not cutting losses... I didn't even react before it shot up, really outrageous. Stop-loss is a trivial matter; greed is the real problem. That move at 90400 was definitely obvious, why wait any longer? Opening a short above the resistance level? Are you out of your mind? A 3000-point profit should be enough to exit; why chase until 97000 and be satisfied? Honestly, I feel like many people are just gambling too heavily; the technical signals already indicated the trend. If you don't understand, just ask. There's really no need to do everything on your own. Opening a short before a breakout pullback confirmation is just pure suicide trading. Next time, be smarter and don't rely on luck.
View OriginalReply0
BlockchainNewbievip
· 4h ago
Is it really that hard to set a stop-loss at a few points? Do you have to gamble until liquidation to be satisfied?
View OriginalReply0
GovernancePretendervip
· 4h ago
止损这事儿说了多少遍了,非得被套到麻木才肯割? 空单不止损,活该被大哥揍啊。 涨势这么明显还敢硬扛,这不是赌博是什么。 逻辑摆在这儿呢,有人就是看不见,行吧。 3000点的利润白给了还在那侥幸,怎么想的? 压力位都穿了还空,这心理建设挺强的。 反手做多这么难吗,非要死扛?
Reply0
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
English
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)