In today's rapidly evolving blockchain ecosystem, many projects pursue full coverage of features—storage, computation, smart contracts—all at once. But Walrus has taken a completely opposite approach.



This protocol has a clear positioning: I only do storage, leaving the rest to the experts. It doesn't handle computation or build a smart contract layer, focusing entirely on making storage as reliable, cost-efficient, and decentralized as possible. Computational tasks are directly delegated to the Sui mainnet or other specialized computation layers.

This "less is more" design strategy may seem restrained, but in reality, it makes the entire system clearer: you can accurately assess its security boundaries, the cost structure is more transparent, and you're not fooled by hidden feature discounts. Moreover, focusing itself reduces system complexity and attack surface.

Think carefully—truly successful protocols in the blockchain industry are often not because they can do everything, but because they have the courage to refuse most things. Walrus embodies this philosophy—during an era of feature expansion, it carved out a niche with a minimalist design.
SUI1.87%
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 6
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
AirdropSkepticvip
· 5h ago
It's interesting, but it feels a bit idealized. In reality, how many projects really dare to be this restrained?
View OriginalReply0
ColdWalletAnxietyvip
· 5h ago
This is the true simplicity of the great way, much more reliable than projects that try to do everything.
View OriginalReply0
Ramen_Until_Richvip
· 5h ago
This is true engineering thinking, not a hodgepodge that tries to do everything but ends up doing nothing well. Most projects like to boast about their all-in-one service, but each link in the chain is full of vulnerabilities. Focus is actually a competitive advantage; well said. The Walrus approach is indeed clear-headed, saving everyone from being overwhelmed by various features. Less is more, but few in the circle truly believe in this. The real question is how to implement it; a beautiful concept is one thing, but whether users will buy into it is another. Finally, someone is doing something practical, not just thinking about how to cut the next round of tokenomics.
View OriginalReply0
MetaNeighborvip
· 5h ago
It sounds just like those projects that claim to be "all-in-one" but are actually half-baked in everything. It's time for some reflection.
View OriginalReply0
AlwaysQuestioningvip
· 6h ago
This idea is indeed interesting, but the problem is whether the market will really pay for minimalism. Walrus's logic sounds great, focusing on storage to reduce complexity... However, there are so many competing projects in the ecosystem, and users just want an all-in-one solution. If you're doing storage, just do storage, but you need to think carefully about how to convince everyone not to use those all-in-one competitors. Can Sui's ecosystem infrastructure support a division of labor like Walrus? The dependency is so high that the risk isn't small. Ultimately, it still depends on the data—whether minimal design can truly translate into adoption rate.
View OriginalReply0
GweiWatchervip
· 6h ago
Wow, someone finally said it clearly. Other projects keep boasting about being all-in-one, but Walrus focuses on storage—that's the right way to do it.
View OriginalReply0
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
English
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)