Gate Square “Creator Certification Incentive Program” — Recruiting Outstanding Creators!
Join now, share quality content, and compete for over $10,000 in monthly rewards.
How to Apply:
1️⃣ Open the App → Tap [Square] at the bottom → Click your [avatar] in the top right.
2️⃣ Tap [Get Certified], submit your application, and wait for approval.
Apply Now: https://www.gate.com/questionnaire/7159
Token rewards, exclusive Gate merch, and traffic exposure await you!
Details: https://www.gate.com/announcements/article/47889
#数字资产市场动态 The digital asset market clarity bill recently introduced by the U.S. Senate has truly stirred up the entire community. The most important point is that it finally clarifies the fundamental issue—whether cryptocurrencies are securities or commodities—this is no longer a gray area. At the same time, the CFTC has been granted oversight over the spot market, which is significant for industry regulation.
There's also an interesting detail: the bill explicitly prohibits crypto companies from paying interest solely because users hold stablecoins, but rewards generated from genuine payment scenarios and trading activities are acceptable. This differentiated approach is quite insightful—on one hand, it aims to protect retail investors; on the other, it doesn't want to stifle DeFi innovation. The regulatory mindset is clearly exposed.
The market's reaction has been quite positive. Tokens like $XRP, $SOL, and $LINK, which are named as candidates for ETF products, are definitely causing excitement in the community. Senator Lummis emphasized on x.com that this is the result of bipartisan consensus and urged the process to move quickly. Does it look like progress is smooth?
But a closer look reveals some concerns. The Senate Banking Committee has postponed the discussion to January 16, and they have already received 75-130 amendments. Sensitive issues like DeFi and yield mechanisms are still being debated repeatedly, indicating that the bill's final draft is far from settled. The industry shouldn't take this as a done deal.
My view is that this legislation is truly unprecedented, but the final version will almost certainly undergo significant fine-tuning in details. The U.S. is trying to balance maintaining innovation competitiveness with financial stability, which is inherently a long-term game. For investors, rather than speculating on regulatory concepts, it’s more important to focus on projects with genuine compliance, real use cases, and long-term value. Regulatory clarity is a good thing, but it doesn't benefit all tokens equally.