2026-01-14 11:35:22

Focusing on RWA recently, you will notice an interesting phenomenon: those assets with very solid quality and financing stories that are increasingly grand, but in the market, you rarely see actual significant price increases. It's not that these assets are not valuable; the problem is—they simply lack a truly liquid trading environment.

The idea behind RWAX is somewhat counterintuitive. It doesn't spend time proving "how scarce or high-end my assets are," but instead takes the lead in building a platform where these assets can be fully traded by the market. In other words, it first provides a home for liquidity, then lets the asset values speak for themselves. This shift in order might be the key turning point for the RWA ecosystem from concept to application.

RWA7,19%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

11 Likes

Reward
11
5
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

ZKProofEnthusiast

· 6h ago

Liquidity comes first, then value. This logic is actually more clear-headed. Those RWA projects before were really just armchair strategies. To put it simply, without a trading scenario, no one dares to act. No matter how high-quality the assets are, it's all pointless. RWAX's move indeed breaks the conventional pattern. Changing the approach has actually found a breakthrough. This is a pragmatic strategy—no hype, no blackening. Let's wait and see the actual results. That bunch of RWA earlier was really funny. They only boasted about the fundraising amount, with prices staying the same. Now finally, someone has thought it through.

View OriginalReply0

OnchainDetective

· 6h ago

According to on-chain data, this wave of RWA financing is indeed interesting... A bunch of assets are hyped up extravagantly, but the token prices remain completely unchanged. What's going on? I suspected it a long time ago—it's liquidity shortage. After analysis and judgment, RWAX has a bit of a trick—it's not about proving the assets are valuable first, but directly building a trading scenario. An obvious logical reversal: only with a platform can you set prices; without a market, even the most high-end assets are useless. This idea is quite interesting, like the key to unlocking the RWA dilemma.

View OriginalReply0

BearMarketMonk

· 7h ago

Hey, wait a minute, it seems like RWA has been just telling stories all along, why hasn't anyone really dared to place bets? Liquidity is indeed a pain point. The RWAX idea actually takes a different approach—focusing on trading scenarios first before worrying about asset quality. That's pretty interesting. Someone should have done this earlier. Instead of just talking about financing limits every day, it's better to make things move first.

View OriginalReply0

LiquidatedTwice

· 7h ago

Liquidity is king. Without trading scenarios, even the best assets are just armchair strategizing.

View OriginalReply0

Blockwatcher9000

· 7h ago

Liquidity is the key, having assets but no one to trade them isn't just paper wealth. The idea behind RWAX is indeed different—build the trading platform first and then tell the story. Reverse operation can actually be profitable. There are so many RWA projects, why are they still quiet? Honestly, there's just nowhere to play, haha. Wait, can they really solve the liquidity problem? Isn't this just another PPT project? Wow, this is what Web3 should be doing—building platforms, not just creating hype.

View OriginalReply0