比特币92,500-93,300美元区间流动性堆积,后市能否直接向上突破?

【币界】最近盯比特币的朋友应该都注意到了——BTC在92,500到93,300美元这个区间堆积了可观的流动性。现在市场里有个有趣的问题在流传:比特币会不会先向下探一探,把这些流动性吃掉,然后再发起新一波上升行情?这种先破后立的走势在加密市场其实不少见,得看市场参与者的决定了。有人觉得会触发止损,也有人赌它直接向上突破。反正这个价格带就是个关键的观察点。

BTC4.24%
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 6
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
BasementAlchemistvip
· 1h ago
I just said this wave is a bit bearish, the liquidity pile here won't break through directly --- It's that old trick again, dip to eat the stop-loss orders and then rebound --- 92500 is really stuck, feels like it needs to drop another wave --- Market participants decide? Ha, isn't that just looking at the mood of the whales --- Watching this range and waiting to see, anyway, one direction will move eventually --- Break through directly? I don't believe it, it's more realistic to shake out the traders first --- This liquidity accumulation is too obvious, feels like a trap --- Everyone's betting on the direction, I bet it will go down first and then see --- What's the key point to watch? Nothing, just waiting to be cut --- Such thick liquidity going straight up? That's wishful thinking --- Stuck at 92 to 93 like this, the next step depends on whether the buying pressure is strong enough
View OriginalReply0
DegenMcsleeplessvip
· 1h ago
Here we go again, that whole liquidity stacking thing—whether it works or not really depends on the market maker's mood, right?
View OriginalReply0
IronHeadMinervip
· 1h ago
Hmm, it's the same "liquidity trap" theory again. Can it really break through this time? --- 92500 to 93300 is such a small margin, waiting to be eaten? I bet it drops first. --- Break through directly? Dream on, it definitely needs to wash out the stops first. --- Same old story, break first then establish, and during the break, some people will get cut. --- Key point? Basically, it's a casino—whoever has more chips gets to decide. --- Whether it breaks through or not doesn't matter; what's important is not to get caught here. I'll wait and see. --- With such obvious liquidity accumulation, institutions must have already been watching. --- Everyone's guessing online, but I think it's uncertain. The technicals aren't as clear as they seem. --- Forget it, no matter how it moves, I'll get cut anyway. Might as well lie flat.
View OriginalReply0
Degentlemanvip
· 1h ago
Why does it feel like we're repeating the old trick of crashing first and then pulling... It still depends on how the whales play it.
View OriginalReply0
NoodlesOrTokensvip
· 2h ago
Hmm... This move is either to directly crash down to absorb liquidity or to go all-in and surge upward, betting on the market maker's mentality.
View OriginalReply0
consensus_failurevip
· 2h ago
Hmm, it's the same old trick of smashing first and then pulling back, the dealer's favorite game. I don't believe it will break directly; it will definitely need to shake out the traders first. From 92,500 to 93,300, there's just not enough room. Let's wait and see who breaks first. The guys betting on a straight up move will probably have to cut losses again this time. Liquidity piling up here means no good news.
View OriginalReply0
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
English
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)