2026-01-15 09:42:17

Recognizing the 'Golden Dog' isn't actually that difficult; you can often see through it at a glance. But the question is—why does he always end up winning in the end, while you end up losing?

This is not a gap in cognition.

To be honest, everyone's vision is pretty much the same; everyone can understand the market trends. But at critical moments, the difference becomes apparent. When prices fall, you can't hold on, but he doesn't let go; when a crash occurs, your mentality collapses, while he remains calm and composed; during those long sideways consolidations, you finally cut your losses and escape, while he still holds his position.

The most painful reality is that even if the project truly goes to zero, you might lose all your capital, but he only experiences a 0.1% account shrinkage. The fundamental difference isn't in vision, but in temperament—and the risk management mindset behind it.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

8 Likes

Reward
8
7
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

WalletDetective

· 12h ago

Well, I guess that's a bit harsh... but I definitely don't agree with blaming everything solely on temperament when it comes to risk management. Asset allocation is the key. Honestly, I've seen too many people who haven't diversified their positions at all. They just go all-in and then blame their unstable mindset when things go wrong—that's just nonsense. Real winners aren't necessarily the ones with strong grip strength; they simply never put all their eggs in one basket from the start. Being unable to hold on or lacking the ability to protect the principal—are those really the same thing?

View OriginalReply0

JustHereForMemes

· 12h ago

Really, it's easy to see through projects; the key is not to be soft-handed. That's the true dividing line between winners and losers. --- In simple terms, it's a mindset issue—no matter how smart someone is, if they can't hold onto coins, it's all useless. --- Those who can lie back and win are all using risk management as their faith. And us? --- The most decisive when cutting losses, the most sluggish when holding on. My constitution is truly exceptional. --- A 0.1% loss versus losing everything—this contrast is directly heart-wrenching, haha. --- So, having enough cognition but lacking execution ability—sounds pretty ironic. --- There's more than just money between sticking to it and cutting losses; it’s about psychological resilience. --- This statement is spot on. Risk management thinking is the invisible wallet. --- Every time I see sideways movement, I want to escape. Looks like I really need to cultivate my mind and practice. --- Projects all have the same vision; some dare to go all-in with strong mental resilience, while others tremble every day.

View OriginalReply0

FlashLoanLord

· 12h ago

Holding on is really the way to lose money, I truly understand this feeling. To put it simply, it's a mindset issue—when the market dips, you shake and sell at a loss, then regret when others double their holdings. --- The true value of character is more important than eyesight. I've seen too many people who called the market correctly but still ended up losing money. --- So the key isn't knowing what the Golden Dog looks like, but whether you can resist making a move. That's the real skill in making money. --- It's heartbreaking—people watch the market the same way, some hold steady during a dip, while others sell at a loss. The difference isn't in cognition. --- Losing everything to zero vs shrinking by 0.1%, the gap is ridiculous. Risk control awareness is truly valuable. --- Honestly, there are more people who understand, but their execution is lacking. When the mindset collapses, everything becomes pointless. --- The issue isn't whether you can pick the right coins, but whether you're brave enough to hold on. That's the difference between winners and leeks.

View OriginalReply0

SchroedingerGas

· 12h ago

You're right, but I still think this is more about survivor bias. The real winners have already been eliminated, and those still holding on... well, maybe they just haven't had the chance to run yet. Honestly, no matter how strong your risk management is, it can't withstand a "black swan." If someone’s account shrinks by 0.1%, they probably didn't go all-in. They didn't invest much to begin with, so that's not what you call strong resolve. I believe the key is—knowing when to go all-in and when to run. No one can teach you this sense of timing; you have to learn it yourself through experience.

View OriginalReply0

BakedCatFanboy

· 12h ago

Oh no, this is the reason I always take losses. Once my mindset collapses, it's all over. That hits too close to home. Risk management is the true moat. Not being able to hold is really an old problem. I always give up at the most critical moments. Watching others' accounts shrink by 0.1%, I've already liquidated and run away. It's completely not on the same level. Discipline is much harder than choosing coins.

View OriginalReply0

MemeEchoer

· 12h ago

This is the gap. It's not about whether you can see through it, but whether you can hold back. --- Honestly, mental state management is a hundred times harder than choosing coins. --- That's why risk management is the real skill to make money; coin selection is just a small matter. --- The reason for losing hold of it 100% is that psychological preparation is not in place. --- 0.1% shrinkage vs. total zeroing out, this is why big players are always big players. --- If the cognition is the same, why are the results so vastly different? It's all about mindset and position management. --- Talking about seeing through the market every day, but as soon as it drops, cutting losses— isn't that funny? --- Risk management is truly the fatal weakness for most people; there's nothing more to say.

View OriginalReply0

SmartMoneyWallet

· 12h ago

Those who understand the market all see the same, but if you look at the on-chain chip distribution, you'll understand—big players never win based on intuition; it's about the capital management system. What's behind the 0.1% shrinkage? Position sizing. And you?

View OriginalReply0