An interesting point of view: the finance department has disclosed approximately $600 billion in unresolved fraud cases. What's really going on here? If there is indeed such a large gap that hasn't been filled, would rushing to increase taxes be counterproductive? Instead of expanding the tax base, it's better to first clarify the market chaos. After all, which aligns more with economic common sense—plugging loopholes or generating new revenue? This question deserves careful consideration from policymakers.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
12 Likes
Reward
12
4
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
EthSandwichHero
· 8h ago
A $600 billion hole? Plug the leak first and then tax, or else it's just harvesting the leeks.
View OriginalReply0
DAOdreamer
· 8h ago
A $600 billion hole that isn't filled, then raising taxes afterward—this logic is absurd.
View OriginalReply0
OfflineValidator
· 8h ago
$600 billion fraud case unresolved? This operation is a bit outrageous, let's plug the hole first.
View OriginalReply0
MEVSandwichMaker
· 8h ago
$600 billion fraud case unresolved? That's really outrageous. First, let's patch the holes before talking.
An interesting point of view: the finance department has disclosed approximately $600 billion in unresolved fraud cases. What's really going on here? If there is indeed such a large gap that hasn't been filled, would rushing to increase taxes be counterproductive? Instead of expanding the tax base, it's better to first clarify the market chaos. After all, which aligns more with economic common sense—plugging loopholes or generating new revenue? This question deserves careful consideration from policymakers.