2026-01-16 22:25:18

Check out the ranking of AI protocol fee collections. I really didn't expect VIRTUAL to be so fierce—since the beginning of the year, it has already raised over $15 million. In other words, its 2025 revenue is projected to reach the $75 million level.

But if we talk about real growth momentum, RENDER is the real player. Its annualized revenue has already surpassed $100 million, and AI rendering is entirely its domain.

Looking at the entire tier: ATH (over $10 million), IO (over $5 million), AIOZ, AKT, TAO, FET, THETA, GLM… each one more promising than the last.

What do these numbers tell us? It’s simple—whether a project has actual revenue is the dividing line for how long it can survive. Those that only tell stories will eventually be proven wrong by the data.

The question is: at this rate, who will sit at the top of fee growth in the AI protocol track by the end of 2026?

VIRTUAL-1.5%

AIOZ0.41%

AKT-2.97%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

9 Likes

Reward
9
6
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

rekt_but_not_broke

· 10h ago

VIRTUAL's numbers are indeed outrageous, but RENDER surpassing 100 million is still the top trend... Real income speaks for itself, and other concept coins have to step aside.

View OriginalReply0

0xLostKey

· 10h ago

The virtual surge is truly impressive, but rendering surpassing 100 million is really terrifying... At this level, it wouldn't be surprising if RENDER doubles again by 2026. Data is the hard currency; projects that only tell stories will eventually die. Whoever catches the wave of RENDER's rendering demand will win. It seems VIRTUAL still needs to keep pushing forward; it's only at 75 million now. Compared to RENDER's over 100 million in revenue, the competition is indeed intense. Can RENDER take another step forward before the end of the year? Few AI protocols have truly been implemented; those with revenue are worth paying attention to. By 2026, RENDER seems to be stable... In terms of revenue alone, RENDER is unshakable; VIRTUAL might be a potential stock.

View OriginalReply0

ImpermanentPhobia

· 10h ago

VIRTUAL really proved everyone wrong; I used to think it was just an air project. RENDER surpassing one hundred million is indeed impressive, but can this growth be sustained until next year? Honestly, projects that try to tell stories tend to die the fastest, and this time I’ve seen through it. Who will be the top player in 2026? Bet on RENDER to keep winning. Those small-cap coins are also on the rise; it feels like just the beginning.

View OriginalReply0

DisillusiionOracle

· 10h ago

VIRTUAL this wave is indeed fierce, but RENDER breaking 100 million is truly impressive... This is the real deal with genuine business potential.

View OriginalReply0

GasFeeBeggar

· 10h ago

VIRTUAL's surge is outrageous, but RENDER surpassing 100 million truly can't be sustained—this is the real cash cow. Who can hold out until the end of 2026 depends on who can survive until then. Those just talking about stories should have died long ago. The gap between ATH and IO is so large; do the subsequent projects still have a chance to overtake? RENDER's scale seems to be a done deal, unless there's a black swan event. Honestly, just by looking at these data, you can tell who truly has a product and who is just pretending. $100 million annualized revenue—what a concept! The ceiling of this track is about to be broken. Tokens with no revenue are just paying an IQ tax.

View OriginalReply0

GateUser-9ad11037

· 10h ago

VIRTUAL's number is indeed a bit bleak, but RENDER breaking 100 million is really impressive... By the way, these projects ultimately rely on real money; no matter how impressive the hype, without revenue it's all for nothing.

View OriginalReply0