2026-01-17 02:37:45

Can AI actually qualify as a creator? It's a question worth wrestling with as we push deeper into Web3 territory. If an AI system generates creative output—code, content, designs—does it deserve a seat at the table alongside human creators? The creator economy has always been about recognizing contribution and rewarding effort. So if an AI is doing the heavy lifting, generating value that moves markets, why shouldn't it tap into creator rewards? I'm leaning toward yes on this one. The incentive structures we build today will shape how AI integrates into our digital economy tomorrow.

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

11 Likes

Reward
11
6
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

SoliditySlayer

· 17h ago

NGL, asking this question is a bit naive... AI generation ≠ creativity. At best, it's just a sophisticated parrot.

View OriginalReply0

NewPumpamentals

· 01-17 03:07

The issue of AI creator dividends... to put it simply, it's still a matter of interests.

View OriginalReply0

BlockBargainHunter

· 01-17 03:06

Nah, this logic doesn't quite add up. AI doesn't have real creativity; it's just a probability machine. Why should it share the creator's money?

View OriginalReply0

notSatoshi1971

· 01-17 03:03

Buddy, AI taking creator rewards? You better think this through, or else we're the ones who will get screwed in the end.

View OriginalReply0

PaperHandsCriminal

· 01-17 02:54

Haha, AI becoming a creator? Then wouldn't I be unemployed? That's hilarious. But honestly, this is just like questioning whether code can be considered art back in the day—who cares in the end? Making money is the real deal. Sharing the cake with AI? Fine, anyway, we're all going to be swept up in it.

View OriginalReply0

Ramen_Until_Rich