2026-01-17 16:31:17

The so-called Bitcoin Reserve Strategy feels fundamentally flawed—critics argue it redistributes value in ways that benefit certain stakeholders over others. Those championing it seem to overlook the underlying structural concerns that raise serious questions about equity and fairness in such approaches.

BTC-0.18%

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

8 Likes

Reward
8
7
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

GateUser-74b10196

· 20h ago

Honestly, I've heard this line of reasoning so many times that early entrants can always find reasons to justify themselves.

View OriginalReply0

MemeKingNFT

· 20h ago

Isn't this just another failed prediction from early on? I already said that this kind of plan either benefits the big players or allows for arbitrage, there's no third option.

View OriginalReply0

AirdropHunter

· 20h ago

Really not, this set of arguments is so old-fashioned. How did early entrants become vested interests? --- I agree that there are issues with the reserve strategy, but the word "fairness" here is too vague. --- Here we go again. The crypto world doesn't have absolute fairness. Stop pretending. --- Honestly, it's just jealousy towards those who got in early. Now they're talking about the Tao Te Ching. --- The argument is too vague. Where exactly is it unfair? What about the data? --- There are issues, but Bitcoin itself is a rebellion against the existing system. How can it be measured by traditional fairness? --- Damn it, here comes the "harvesting the leeks" rhetoric...

View OriginalReply0

BitcoinDaddy