The U.S. Supreme Court is now weighing in on just how much power a president actually has over the economy—and it's playing out through the fight over Fed leadership. The Lisa Cook dispute isn't just bureaucratic drama; it's a test case on executive authority versus institutional independence. When the highest court examines these boundaries, it shapes everything from interest rate decisions to inflation policy—the very forces that ripple through markets. For anyone watching macro trends and monetary policy shifts, this battle matters more than most realize.

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 4
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
StableBoivip
· 14h ago
Honestly, this matter is much deeper than it appears on the surface... Once the independence of the Federal Reserve is compromised, the subsequent macro policies will be completely thrown into disarray.
View OriginalReply0
AirdropHunterXMvip
· 14h ago
Is the Federal Reserve personnel struggle so intense? Basically, it's just a power game, and in the end, retail investors are the ones who suffer.
View OriginalReply0
ProveMyZKvip
· 14h ago
NGL, the Fed's move in this game is really brilliant. The president wants to intervene but can't... This is the real power game.
View OriginalReply0
DeFiChefvip
· 14h ago
The Federal Reserve's issues will ultimately be decided by the courts. In other words, the boundaries of presidential power will need to be redrawn again.
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin

Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)