Many people’s first reaction when seeing this account is: “Another TikTok influencer + bot, just look and don’t take seriously.” But if you actually click in and look, you’ll find a not-so-comfortable fact. The truth is: this account’s profits are not exaggerated, each individual trade is small, but almost every one is positive. No explosive wins, no emotional over-leverage, and you won’t see curves supported by one or two lucky hits. The account is here: This is not a “100x overnight” story. What’s truly worth noting is his behavior pattern: low-frequency noise, extremely high consistency—each trade seems to be taking a small misprice that the market hasn’t noticed, rather than betting on a specific outcome. This directly dismisses the luck theory—if it were just luck, the gains and losses would be highly dispersed; but what you see is “modest returns, but consistently positive,” which indicates he’s not making predictions but executing. The real structural advantage is: the script has no emotions, no narrative chasing, it only acts when prices temporarily deviate, leaving before the correction. This edge may seem boring, but in markets like Polymarket, driven by retail sentiment, it’s actually the easiest to sustain long-term. Why do most people fail to make money? Because they pursue excitement and certainty, but this pattern requires acceptance: each individual trade feels insignificant, the process offers no sense of achievement, leaving only repetition and disciplined emotional traders. Here, they are naturally at a disadvantage. Whether he can turn $10 into $100,000 is anyone’s guess. But if you look into the history of this account, you’ll find a more important question: on Polymarket, does the more “human-like” trading approach tend to be systematically eaten up? If you want to use copy trading on Polymarket, I recommend: #Polymarket