Galaxy Research Director: New US SEC Rules Officially Mark the End of Gensler Era's Hostile Regulatory Stance Toward Crypto Industry

CycleProphet · 2026-03-21T01:46:05+00:00

The U.S. SEC and CFTC have released digital asset classification guidance, clearly categorizing them into five types, and treating only digital securities as securities, which require registration or exemption from registration. The new guidance replaces the previous framework, providing clarity for the crypto industry, but has limited legal binding force, and future changes still warrant attention.

CycleProphet

2026-03-21 01:46:05

Abstract generation in progress

Deep Tide TechFlow News, March 21 — Galaxy Research Director Alex Thorn posted on X social platform that the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), in conjunction with the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC), released a milestone digital asset classification guideline this Tuesday. The guideline officially categorizes digital assets into five types: digital commodities, digital collectibles, digital tools, stablecoins, and digital securities (tokenized securities), clarifying that only the last category constitutes securities, which must be registered or exempted under federal securities laws.

This guideline, as an interpretive rule at the commission level, was officially published in the Federal Register, replacing the “investment contract” analysis framework used since 2019 under Gensler. It provides two clear pathways for tokens to be deemed outside the scope of securities: first, if the issuer completes its core management commitments, the investment contract terminates, and the token can be freely traded as a non-security in the secondary market; second, if the issuer abandons the project or remains silent for a long period, the investment contract also terminates. Additionally, the guideline clarifies thatairdrops, mining, and staking generally do not constitute securities transactions, and asset wrapping or unwrapping does not change their security status.

Alex Thorn believes this guideline marks the end of Gensler’s adversarial regulatory stance toward the crypto industry, providing important clarity for institutional entry. However, he also notes that interpretive rules lack legal binding force and can be overturned by the new administration at any time, which is a core reason why industry advocates continue to push for legislation like the CLARITY Act.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.