Futures
Access hundreds of perpetual contracts
TradFi
Gold
One platform for global traditional assets
Options
Hot
Trade European-style vanilla options
Unified Account
Maximize your capital efficiency
Demo Trading
Introduction to Futures Trading
Learn the basics of futures trading
Futures Events
Join events to earn rewards
Demo Trading
Use virtual funds to practice risk-free trading
Launch
CandyDrop
Collect candies to earn airdrops
Launchpool
Quick staking, earn potential new tokens
HODLer Airdrop
Hold GT and get massive airdrops for free
Pre-IPOs
Unlock full access to global stock IPOs
Alpha Points
Trade on-chain assets and earn airdrops
Futures Points
Earn futures points and claim airdrop rewards
Just caught wind of something worth paying attention to regarding the quantum computing threat to bitcoin that's been making rounds lately. Turns out it might not be the doomsday scenario everyone's talking about.
CoinShares, one of the major players managing digital assets globally, just put out a report basically saying hold up—the quantum threat to crypto is getting way overblown. They're arguing that while fears about quantum computers eventually breaking bitcoin's encryption are legitimate, the actual near-term risk to markets is way smaller than the narrative suggests.
Here's what caught my eye. Everyone's been citing these wild estimates that like 20-50% of all bitcoin could theoretically become vulnerable to quantum attacks. But CoinShares dug into the actual numbers and it's a different story. They focused on legacy P2PK addresses where public keys are permanently visible on the blockchain—basically the most vulnerable spots if quantum computers actually get good enough. Their estimate? About 1.6 million BTC, or roughly 8% of total supply, sits in these older address types.
But here's the thing that actually matters for markets. The amount of bitcoin concentrated enough that stealing it could actually move prices? That's only around 10,200 BTC. The rest is scattered across more than 32,000 separate chunks averaging about 50 BTC each. So even if a quantum attacker had the capability, they'd be cracking through thousands of smaller targets instead of hitting one big jackpot. It's slower, messier, and way less profitable.
On the quantum computing side, CoinShares is saying we're talking about needing machines roughly 100,000 times more powerful than what exists today. Google's Willow chip that everyone was hyped about? It's 105 qubits. Actually breaking bitcoin's cryptography would need millions. That puts us at least a decade out, maybe longer.
What I found interesting is how they're framing this. Instead of treating quantum as some emergency that needs immediate crisis management, they're saying it's an engineering problem bitcoin can handle gradually. There are already proposals like BIP-360 that could let users migrate to quantum-resistant formats over time, so it's not like we're sitting around doing nothing.
The whole thing reminds me of how crypto tends to cycle through existential fears every few years. People get nervous about structure, look for things to blame when prices wobble, and suddenly every theoretical risk feels imminent. But when you actually dig into the data, the picture usually looks different.
BTC is trading around $73.19K right now, up slightly on the day. The broader crypto market is relatively flat. Worth keeping an eye on how this quantum narrative develops, especially as more institutional players start asking harder questions about long-term security. But based on what CoinShares is showing, the panic button probably isn't the right move here.