Today I saw in the group again saying, "How is it so coincidental, A transfers to B, B immediately rebalances, as if someone is watching..." In fact, many so-called coincidence transfers, when broken down, follow a pretty ordinary path: first withdrawing from CEX to a new address, then splitting a few transactions to relay, then exchanging tokens through routers/aggregators, and finally returning to an old wallet or being consolidated away. If that intermediate step just happens to occur around your order placement time, it's easy to imagine it as being "sniped."

I usually focus on three things: whether it's the same batch of funds (the same withdrawal address / same type of consolidation address), whether it follows a fixed route (the same DEX/aggregator contract), and whether there's that MEV flavor of "being a little faster than you every time" (like your swap being sandwiched within the same block). To put it simply, if you straighten out the timeline, most of the explanations make sense—it's not necessarily a conspiracy, just laziness, scripts, or gas-saving habits.

Recently, the testnet incentive/points system also looks quite similar. Everyone is running transactions everywhere to see if the mainnet will issue tokens, and on-chain it looks very active, but in reality, it's just a bunch of people copying and pasting paths according to tutorials... What about you?