I just looked at a DAO proposal, which superficially states "Increase participation," but after reading the incentive details, I realized: voting rights are tied to subsidies, the more actively someone participates, the more they are favored, which ends up pushing long-term contributors to the sidelines… It’s funny and frustrating, feeling like the power structure is wrapped in a layer of sugar coating. To put it simply, when I review proposals now, I look for three things: who gets new permissions, who receives ongoing cash flow, and who only gets one-time rewards. Recently, there’s been a bunch of AI Agents/auto-trading claiming to "automatically help you interact and vote on-chain," and I find it convenient and appealing, but I also wonder: after giving out permissions, who’s responsible if something goes wrong? Anyway, before I vote, I first revoke and delegate permissions thoroughly—dreaming of retirement, but not retiring my wallet just yet.