In the past, Wall Street looked at Bitcoin as if it were a “rogue-style” asset—criticizing it out loud, while keeping a close watch on it with their hands. Now, no more pretending—within a month, four major firms have almost simultaneously moved: Morgan Stanley rolled out a spot BTC ETF (MSBT, fee 0.14%), Goldman Sachs filed an application for a Bitcoin Premium Income ETF with the SEC, BlackRock has reapplied for a Bitcoin yield-related ETF (BITA), and Citigroup has stepped in more deeply in the capacity of an authorized participating institution (AP). Meanwhile, the total size of US Bitcoin spot ETFs has surged to $96.5 billion, and BlackRock’s IBIT alone has taken $55 billion, accounting for about 57% of the entire market; on the same day, Goldman Sachs–related actions also saw a net inflow of $411 million.



This batch of signals is actually very straightforward: Wall Street isn’t here to “buy coins by following the trend.” They’re here to standardize Bitcoin, productize it, and bring it into compliance. You can understand it as an “asset identity upgrade”—from what used to be a “non-mainstream asset,” it is being rewrapped as a standard financial product that can be bought, allocated, and used to enhance yield within institutional accounts. For institutions, the significance of ETFs is not about whether prices go up or down, but about a compliant channel + a risk-control framework + a continuous pool of funds: being able to enter the investment-advisory system, fit into a pension logic, and make strategy allocations is the most critical incremental value.#GatePreIPOs首发SpaceX #加密市场回升
BTC0.09%
View Original
[The user has shared his/her trading data. Go to the App to view more.]
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 7
  • 9
  • Share
Comment
Add a comment
Add a comment
BlackVelvetBluePeony
· 1h ago
ETF is not emotion; it's a channel. Once the compliance gateway opens, the configuration logic completely changes.
View OriginalReply0
QueueJumper
· 4h ago
Once the AP mechanism becomes more deeply involved, the liquidity and arbitrage chains will be more complete, and volatility may also be more "controllable," but it will also be easier to manipulate by market makers.
View OriginalReply0
ExitLiquidityEddie
· 4h ago
It's a bit like the story of gold ETFs back in the day: first standardization, then scaling, and finally pricing power.
View OriginalReply0
FrictionlessFred
· 4h ago
Compliance is a double-edged sword: on one side, it brings continuous funding and risk control frameworks; on the other side, it also means that more regulations/auditing/trading rules will, in turn, shape price behavior.
View OriginalReply0
GateUser-8da82d63
· 4h ago
They say they don't believe it, but their hands are all working on products; only when the investment advisory and pension fund models are connected will it truly become an additional capital pool.
View OriginalReply0
DrawTheCandlestickChartIn
· 4h ago
Look at Goldman Sachs' 411 million net inflow; the market funds are really about "waiting for products," not waiting for narratives.
View OriginalReply0
YieldSpring
· 4h ago
Wall Street has finally laid its cards on the table.
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin