Recently, I've been looking at a few RWA on-chain project pools again. The liquidity on the interface looks quite full, but upon opening the details, I found that the redemption terms are written very "gentle": T+N, limits, possible suspensions, and even waiting for offline asset settlement. To put it simply, the digital numbers on the chain are very smooth, but when it comes to converting back to fiat currency, it might get stuck.



Lately, there's been talk about certain regions increasing taxes and tightening or loosening compliance regulations. When deposit and withdrawal expectations change, everyone pays more attention to "being able to withdraw at any time." But for many RWAs, "withdrawable" is conditional. Don’t just look at how deep the pool is; first, see who has the authority to change the rules and when they can do so. Anyway, whenever I see unclear redemption policies, I treat it as a liquidity illusion and avoid it.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • Comment
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
Add a comment
Add a comment
No comments
  • Pin