PakMaliki

🔥 💎 📉 🪙 📈 🔒 🔗 ⚖️ 🚀 🏦
Controlled Deficit: How Token Burning Turns GT Tokenomics into a Strategy.
Token burning in the crypto industry is often perceived superficially—as an event that temporarily attracts market attention. However, in the case of GateToken (GT), this mechanism has a much deeper meaning. It is embedded in the very architecture of the token and has been systematically implemented since 2019, forming a controlled deficit and a long-term economic model rather than a short-term effect.
Burning GT is the process of permanently removing tokens from circulation by transferring them to a special on-chain address that is inaccessible. After such a transaction, the tokens cease to exist as an economic unit. This means that the total supply of GT decreases not just in theory, but actually, with verifiable proof on the blockchain.
The burning event for Q4 2025 marked another stage of this process. Over 2.16 million GT were irreversibly destroyed, and the total reduction from the initial 300 million tokens has already exceeded 60%. This dynamic indicates a reliably functioning mechanism that has endured several market cycles.
The practical role of GT burning lies in several fundamental aspects:
1) Reduction of available supply creates a deficit;
2) The deficit reduces long-term pressure on the token;
3) Predictability of the process increases trust;
4) Each remaining GT gains a larger share of the ecosystem economy.
These factors together form a balanced model between platform growth and token holder interests.
Burning makes no sense without the development of the ecosystem itself. Gate simultaneously expands trading infrastructure, Web3 products, and GT use cases, which amplifies the deflationary effect. When the token not only disappears from circulation but also increases its practical value, a sustainable demand foundation is formed. No wonder they say: “True value appears where scarcity is combined with utility.”
It is worth noting the discipline of execution. Regardless of market conditions, Gate adheres to a predetermined burning roadmap. Such consistency reduces speculative factors and gradually shifts GT from a trading token category to a strategic asset of the ecosystem.
GateToken burning is not a technical “headline event,” but a tool for economic management. It functions as a long-term supply regulator, enhances trust in the token, and creates a foundation for its role in the Gate ecosystem in 2026 and beyond.
#GateSquareCreatorNewYearIncentives
#GT2025Q4BurnCompleted
#GateSquare
$GT
$GT

Winners Announcement | #PostToWinLaunchpadKDK
1️⃣ 400 KDK：discovery
2️⃣ 200 KDK：Ryakpanda、xxx40xxx、YamahaBlue、小财神Plutus、CryptoEye
3️⃣ 40 KDK：AnnaCryptoWriter、özlem_1903、ybaser、MrFlower_XingChen、dragon_fly2、专抢小孩棒棒糖or、Peacefulheart、阿酒、moathalmahdi、币靠普、orange666、chartking、CryptoRock、大户笔记、Yanlin
Thanks to everyone who participated. Stay tuned for more activities.

🎉 Lucky Prize Pool is Live!
Check in daily, watch streams & interact to earn Heat Points 💪
80 Heat Points = 1 lottery draw
🎁 Prizes refreshed: iPhone 17 Pro Max / Gate × Red Bull Jacket / Cap / GT / $50 Position Trial Voucher
Try your luck now 👉 https://www.gate.com/activities/watch-to-earn?now_period=14
Don’t let the big prizes slip away! 👀

#JusticeDepartmentSellsBitcoin As the United States enters 2026, the conversation around Bitcoin has shifted from whether it should be adopted to who truly controls its fate inside government institutions. While public rhetoric from the White House suggests a gradual normalization of Bitcoin as a strategic asset, recent actions by federal agencies reveal a more complex and fragmented reality. What appears on the surface as policy alignment is, in practice, an unresolved power struggle beneath Washington’s institutional layers.
The contradiction became visible when internal asset-management records revealed that Bitcoin seized in a high-profile criminal case was quietly liquidated rather than retained. The sale, carried out through the U.S. Marshals Service under prosecutorial direction, stood in contrast to the administration’s broader messaging about preserving confiscated digital assets for long-term strategic purposes. Though the amount sold was modest relative to total market supply, the symbolism of the action was significant.
At the center of the controversy lies a structural tension between executive vision and prosecutorial discretion. Executive directives issued in 2025 framed forfeited Bitcoin as a sovereign asset—something to be safeguarded rather than immediately converted into dollars. Yet federal prosecutors, operating under longstanding statutory authority, retain broad control over seized property and asset disposition. This legal gray zone allows actions that may be technically lawful while remaining politically misaligned.
The Southern District of New York has emerged as a focal point in this debate. Historically regarded as the most influential prosecutorial district in the country, SDNY has often operated with a degree of autonomy that surpasses other jurisdictions. In financial and crypto-related cases, its decisions frequently set de facto national precedents. The liquidation of seized Bitcoin under its oversight suggests a reluctance within parts of the judicial system to treat digital assets as legitimate reserve instruments.
This stance persists despite evolving regulatory signals elsewhere. Guidance from senior Justice Department officials has emphasized restraint toward non-custodial tools and open-source developers, while regulatory bodies have increasingly acknowledged that not all crypto infrastructure fits traditional financial classifications. Still, enforcement actions continue to reflect a conservative interpretation—one rooted in risk avoidance rather than strategic adoption.
Legally, prosecutors can defend such sales by pointing to asset-forfeiture statutes that grant discretion without specifying post-seizure asset management standards. Politically, however, these decisions undermine attempts to present a unified national strategy. By converting Bitcoin into cash, agencies effectively remove exposure to an asset that remains controversial within traditional institutions—signaling internal discomfort rather than confidence.
For the administration, this creates a delicate dilemma. Direct intervention could provoke accusations of undermining judicial independence, while inaction allows policy fragmentation to persist. The result is a quiet but consequential disconnect between public commitments and operational behavior—one that global markets and foreign governments are carefully observing.
From a market perspective, the issue extends far beyond a single transaction. Strategic reserves rely on consistency, transparency, and institutional coherence. When different branches of government pursue conflicting approaches to the same asset, it weakens credibility and introduces uncertainty into long-term planning. Investors are less concerned about the sale itself than about what it reveals regarding internal alignment.
The broader implication is that Bitcoin’s path toward sovereign recognition faces obstacles not from volatility or public opposition, but from bureaucratic inertia and institutional resistance. The struggle over Bitcoin has evolved—it is no longer fought through headlines or legislation, but through internal memos, asset transfers, and discretionary decisions made out of public view.
If the United States intends to position Bitcoin as part of its strategic future, coordination across executive, regulatory, and judicial bodies will be essential. Without that alignment, the greatest barrier to state-level crypto adoption will not be market forces—but unresolved fractures within government power structures themselves.

Last night’s analysis indicates that the market has completed the expected second peak and has started to decline. The previously positioned Bitcoin and Ethereum long positions have been successfully closed for profit. Moving forward, it is advisable to continue shorting at high levels! Trading strategy: short Bitcoin at 92,000-92,500, target 91,000-90,000; short Ethereum at 3,230-3,260, target 3,180-3,100. The market successfully triggered entry points tonight and again followed the expected decline, with Bitcoin and Ethereum short positions closed for profit!
The strategy is time-sensitive and should be based on private real-time guidance!

Bitcoin faces resistance at the pressure level, will it pull back and rise again? XRP has a chance!$BTC $ETH $XRP