Stable Investment Analysis (in 6 Red Flags)

@ Stable crushed Phase 1 with $825M TVL in 20 minutes and just launched public testnet. But beneath the hype lies uncomfortable questions about stablecoin concentration risk, insider positioning, and whether this actually solves payments or just creates new bagholders. Here’s the honest read:

TL;DR: The Setup

What it is: USDT-native Layer 1 backed by Tether insiders - but who really benefits?

The numbers: $28M seed raised, $825M pre-deposits (filled in 20 minutes—too fast?), public testnet live, but mainnet launch weeks away with early insiders ready to exit

The thesis: Stablecoins need payment rails, but Stable’s structure favors those with early access while retail gets last-mover disadvantage

Value Proposition - 7/10

What It Actually Solves:

USDT-as-gas eliminates dual-token juggling. Fair. But honest question: do users actually care or are they just chasing yield on pre-deposit farms?

Honest Assessment:

• Solves a real problem (gas fees on stablecoin transfers)

• But Solana/Polygon already handle $100K transfers for <$1

• Tether USDT0 cross-chain works similarly without new L1

• The “pain point” might be smaller than marketing suggests

What’s Actually Valuable:

Institutional payment infrastructure, not retail payments. But retail gets the speculation while institutions get the protocol layer.

Red Flag #1: Solution Looking for Problem

USDT transfers are already cheap. Sub-$1 on @ Solana. Why launch entire L1 for 10-20% fee reduction?

Competition - 6/10

The Real Competitive Landscape:

• @ Plasma ($XPL): Similar thesis, raised less, but arriving with different tokenomics

• @ Solana + $USDT: Already $5B daily USDT volume, friction already minimal

• @ LayerZero_Core / $USDT0: Cross-chain USDT works without new infrastructure

Why Stable Isn’t Unbeatable:

• First-mover advantage real but copyable in 6 months

• Network effects don’t compound if alternative work equally well

• Validator set concentration (only 30+ major validators) = centralization risk

Red Flag #2: Timing Coincidence

GENIUS Act passes (June 2025) → @ Tether_to suddenly pushes new L1 (August 2025) → Pre-deposits oversubscribed 39x (October 2025). Feels coordinated

Traction - 7/10

$825M Pre-Deposits: Reality Check

• Filled in 20 minutes (FOMO, not organic demand)

• 95% likely from whale addresses and insiders pre-notified

• No retail FOMO phase (filled too fast)

• Money locked until mainnet (can’t exit pre-mainnet)

What This Actually Indicates:

• Institutional interest is real

• But distribution is concentrated

• Early insiders will dump on mainnet

• Retail enters at peak enthusiasm

Public Testnet Activity (Modest):

• 600+ Discord subscribers (not huge for major L1 launch)

• Developer activity TBD (testnet is 2 weeks old)

• Real application launches post-mainnet

• No metrics on actual transaction volume

Red Flag #3: Pre-Deposit Structure

Money locked in vaults until mainnet claim. Classic unlock-and-dump structure. Early depositors become sellers when claims open

Narrative - 7/10

Why The Story Is Compelling:

• Regulatory clarity (GENIUS Act) creates urgency

• @ Tether_to endorsement signals institutional blessing

• Payment infrastructure gap is real

• Timing feels inevitable

Why The Story Has Holes:

• “USDT as gas” isn’t revolutionary; it’s incremental

• Stablecoin adoption doesn’t require new L1

• Real beneficiaries are protocol insiders, not users

• Retail narrative: “earn yield on stablecoins” (classic last-cycle trap)

Red Flag #4: Regulatory Narrative Too Perfect

GENIUS Act passes → suddenly “perfect timing” for USDT L1? Feels like deal was already structured and waiting for regulatory cover

Backers - 5/10

Who Actually Benefits:

• @ paoloardoino (Tether CEO): Direct beneficiary if Stable becomes dominant payment rail

• @ bitfinex: Liquidity provider that profits from exchange fees

• Franklin Templeton: Strategic position in emerging infrastructure

• Early seed rounds: Positioned to sell into mainnet euphoria

Who Gets Hurt:

• Retail buying into pre-deposit vaults

• Late mainnet entrants

• Users expecting “free payments” (they’ll pay in other ways)

Red Flag #5: Conflict of Interest

Tether’s CEO backing infrastructure using $USDT as native token = he profits from adoption. Not disclosed as major conflict.

Red Flag #6: Insider Positioning

$28M seed round likely got massive allocations. Pre-deposits from insiders. Public mainnet → guaranteed dump into retail FOMO

Market Timing - 6/10

Why Launch Now?

• GENIUS Act provides cover

• Stablecoin sentiment positive

• But timing also suspiciously convenient

What Could Go Wrong:

• Regulatory shift (GENIUS Act faces opposition)

• Competing stablecoin L1s launch faster

• Transaction volume disappoints post-mainnet

• Insider dumps crash token value

The Honest Read:

Launch timing = “we waited for regulatory clarity, then immediately went to market.” That’s either excellent execution or suspicious coordination

Final Score: 38/60 (63%)

The Bull Case (Still Real):

Infrastructure for global payments matters. USDT-native networks will eventually be standard. Early positioning captures value. Mainnet execution looks solid.

The Bear Case (Also Real):

• Insider pre-positioning before retail entry

• Solution solves problem that’s already mostly solved

• Token structure favors early depositors over mainnet buyers

• Regulatory risk if GENIUS Act faces challenges

The Uncomfortable Truth:

This might be a legitimately good infrastructure play, but the distribution mechanics heavily favor insiders. Early depositors will sell into mainnet FOMO. Retail enters at peak enthusiasm. Classic structure

Bottom Line:

Stable has real technical merit and addresses real problems. But the timing, pre-deposit structure, and insider positioning all follow the playbook for “infrastructure launch that benefits early insiders.” That doesn’t make it bad - it just makes the risk asymmetric

Be careful about which side of the timing you’re on🚩

Not financial advice, but notice how institutional pre-deposits filled in 20 minutes while retail still asking “what’s Stable?” That gap between insider and retail entry is where most losses happen

Disclaimer:

1. This article is reprinted from [green_but_red]. All copyrights belong to the original author [green_but_red]. If there are objections to this reprint, please contact the Gate Learn team, and they will handle it promptly.
2. Liability Disclaimer: The views and opinions expressed in this article are solely those of the author and do not constitute any investment advice.
3. Translations of the article into other languages are done by the Gate Learn team. Unless mentioned, copying, distributing, or plagiarizing the translated articles is prohibited.