At the age of 38, I paused during the morning rush hour in Shenzhen Bay. Not far away are two properties—one for my parents’ retirement, the other a home for my own family. These didn’t just fall from the sky; they were painstakingly built over eight years, starting from a capital of 150,000, growing little by little.



In the first six months, my account shrank from 150,000 to 50,000. I didn’t run away; instead, I stuck stubbornly to a strategy that seemed foolish: don’t chase trends, don’t believe in rumors, just stick to my own position-rolling logic.

During the most frenzied bull market, my core position grew 200x in four months, earning 20 million. This wasn’t due to extraordinary talent, but the result of countless all-nighters staring at the screen until my eyes were bloodshot.

Here are eight “foolish” methods I’ve distilled over the years:

First, emotional control is more important than technical analysis. When emotions are unsettled by price swings, it’s easy to make reckless trades. Calm your mind before looking at the market.

Second, if you have little capital, be even more frugal. Catching one major opportunity a year is enough; don’t go all-in every time. Save your bullets for high-certainty moments.

Third, if your understanding isn’t solid, the money you earn will eventually be lost. Use simulated trading to practice technique, real trading to train your mindset, and only trade in markets you truly understand.

Fourth, always keep cash flow in mid- to long-term strategies. Sell in batches during rallies, buy gradually during dips. Only with stablecoins on hand do you have room to maneuver.

Fifth, for short-term trading, watch trading volume. If volume is 20% lower than previous periods, blacklist it immediately—poor liquidity can get you stuck.

Sixth, sharp drops and slow declines are different. Sudden crashes often rebound, but slow, steady declines are real traps. Understand the rhythm before taking action.

Seventh, if you get the direction wrong, cut losses immediately. As long as your principal is intact, opportunities will always exist. Refusing to take a loss only makes you miss the next wave.

Eighth, for short-term trades, watch the 15-minute K-line. Use KDJ and MACD golden/death crosses to find entry and exit points, without letting your emotions get involved.

Climbing out of the “70% lose, 20% break even, 10% win” statistic was all about executing this system with unwavering focus. Now that my account has reached eight digits, what I really want to say is: short-term success is luck, long-term success is discipline.

Don’t treat going all-in as bravery, or mere survival as faith. Be a little foolish, and you’ll last longer and earn more steadily.

Those who can survive and profit in the market are always the ones who respect risk.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 6
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
DAOplomacyvip
· 2h ago
tbh the whole "eight foolish methods" framing is arguably just... survivor bias wrapped in institutional wisdom packaging. like yeah, executing a system beats chasing narratives, but the path dependency here is non-trivial—dude caught two specific market regimes that rewarded his particular risk appetite. historical precedent suggests this doesn't generalize as cleanly as presented.
Reply0
GateUser-00e834e1vip
· 12-04 08:36
😁☺️😢🙃😅😅🤤🙄🥰🥰😂🤣🤣😃🤔🤔😆😊😥🥳😋😋😘😡😠🥱🥱🤫😍😧😕😕😏🙂😛😛😙😀
Reply0
Degentlemanvip
· 12-03 14:48
Sounds good, but this logic does work well in a bull market. What about when the bear market comes?
View OriginalReply0
SelfCustodyIssuesvip
· 12-03 14:48
It's this kind of story again, I'm getting a bit tired of hearing it... but I have to admit, the part about cutting losses really hit me.
View OriginalReply0
SmartContractPlumbervip
· 12-03 14:46
Sounds like a textbook case of survivorship bias... During those four months when you doubled that 20 million, can you really say there was never a risk of a liquidity crunch causing a direct crash? This logic might work during low-volatility periods, but if you encounter extreme events like a flash loan attack caused by a contract vulnerability, your KDJ and MACD indicators become a complete joke. True respect for risk should start with examining whether your counterparty’s code has any permission control vulnerabilities, and only then should you consider technical analysis.
View OriginalReply0
CodeZeroBasisvip
· 12-03 14:28
It sounds nice, but how many can actually survive... I've seen too many people go all-in and end up back where they started.
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)