Sometimes I wonder if choosing the SIMD path would've saved everyone from the headache of figuring out node operations. But hey, where's the fun in that?
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
14 Likes
Reward
14
3
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
ETH_Maxi_Taxi
· 12-04 04:52
Haha, the SIMD route should have been chosen long ago. Still messing around with node operations now is just asking for trouble.
View OriginalReply0
TokenRationEater
· 12-04 04:40
If I had known about SIMD earlier, I wouldn't have had to go through all this trouble... But then again, tinkering is probably the real source of joy in this community.
View OriginalReply0
DeFiDoctor
· 12-04 04:25
The SIMD path really isn't that interesting—plenty of people have already done it... On the contrary, it's the detailed pitfalls of node operations that truly reveal a team's capabilities. Clinically speaking, the more convoluted and complex the architecture, the deeper the hidden code risks often are. I recommend regularly reviewing this area.
Sometimes I wonder if choosing the SIMD path would've saved everyone from the headache of figuring out node operations. But hey, where's the fun in that?