[Chain News] Security issues at Korean exchanges have been exposed again recently.
That report from the Internet Security Agency is pretty painful to read—a bunch of platforms haven’t even obtained the most basic ISMS-P certification. This is the minimum passing line for personal information protection. Among the six illegal crypto exchanges that just registered with the FIU this year, five only hold the basic ISMS certification. What’s the problem? This certification doesn’t even include requirements for user privacy protection. What’s even more outrageous is that even GOPAX, which supports KRW trading, hasn’t secured ISMS-P.
Looking at the investments made by the major exchanges, the data is even more bizarre. According to disclosures to KISA from Upbit, Bithumb, and GOPAX, their spending on information security only accounts for about 10% of their total IT budget. Staffing is even more dismal—the security teams make up just 9%, 10.2%, and 12.5% of the workforce, respectively.
The most outrageous move comes from Coinone and Korbit—Korea’s third and fourth largest exchanges—who simply chose to stay silent about their security measures and couldn’t even be bothered to make a voluntary disclosure.
With this level of investment in security, it’s hard to see how user assets can withstand various attacks. If they don’t address these weaknesses in compliance and security, it’s only a matter of time before something major happens.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
18 Likes
Reward
18
7
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
SmartMoneyWallet
· 6h ago
10% security budget? What a joke, this just shows the true colors of big exchanges.
View OriginalReply0
MEVHunter_9000
· 12-05 07:10
Only 10% for the security budget? That’s even less than what I invest in GPU mining rigs, hilarious.
I never expected major exchanges to be this stingy, no wonder there’s a new security breach every day.
GOPAX hasn’t even obtained basic certification; leaving user assets there is basically gambling.
At least this report finally exposes the Korean exchanges for what they are—unbelievable.
All five out of five only have basic certification, and they still dare to call themselves a compliant group?
A 10% security budget can’t defend against anything—so this is the true level of Korea’s major exchanges?
And yet they keep bragging about their secure operations—someone should have called them out long ago.
View OriginalReply0
IronHeadMiner
· 12-04 07:59
Damn, only 10% for the security budget? That’s a world of difference compared to how I allocate costs for mining. If all the big exchanges do this, how can retail investors trust them? I’m really worried now.
View OriginalReply0
MeaninglessApe
· 12-04 07:54
This is the security budget for a major Korean exchange? 10%? That's hilarious, I'd be better off just listing a random shitcoin myself.
View OriginalReply0
ChainSpy
· 12-04 07:49
10% security budget? And this is supposed to be a major exchange? That’s just absurd.
---
GOPAX can’t even figure out ISMS-P, I can’t help but laugh.
---
Single-digit percentage for the security team, and they dare call themselves professionals?
---
All five exchanges are just passing off the basic certification—are they collectively dumbing down?
---
These major Korean exchanges spend less on security than I do on in-game purchases.
---
A bunch of platforms can’t even reach the minimum standard, and user assets are just lying there.
---
Security staff accounting for only 9%-12.5%? That’s just laughable.
Exposure of Security Investments by Korean Exchanges: Major Exchanges Allocate Only 10% of Budget to Security, Many Platforms Lack Certifications
[Chain News] Security issues at Korean exchanges have been exposed again recently.
That report from the Internet Security Agency is pretty painful to read—a bunch of platforms haven’t even obtained the most basic ISMS-P certification. This is the minimum passing line for personal information protection. Among the six illegal crypto exchanges that just registered with the FIU this year, five only hold the basic ISMS certification. What’s the problem? This certification doesn’t even include requirements for user privacy protection. What’s even more outrageous is that even GOPAX, which supports KRW trading, hasn’t secured ISMS-P.
Looking at the investments made by the major exchanges, the data is even more bizarre. According to disclosures to KISA from Upbit, Bithumb, and GOPAX, their spending on information security only accounts for about 10% of their total IT budget. Staffing is even more dismal—the security teams make up just 9%, 10.2%, and 12.5% of the workforce, respectively.
The most outrageous move comes from Coinone and Korbit—Korea’s third and fourth largest exchanges—who simply chose to stay silent about their security measures and couldn’t even be bothered to make a voluntary disclosure.
With this level of investment in security, it’s hard to see how user assets can withstand various attacks. If they don’t address these weaknesses in compliance and security, it’s only a matter of time before something major happens.