After seeing so many AI projects lately, there are actually very few that really make you stop and take a closer look. However, there is one called OpenMind, and its approach is indeed quite different from the others.
They didn’t follow the old path of “competing on parameter scale” or “throwing money at computing power.” Their core idea goes in a different direction—breaking down the cognitive system into independent modules. These modules can evolve on their own and collaborate with each other, and more importantly, the entire system is completely open to the community.
There’s actually a lot of room for imagination here. In the past, you could only use AI tools created by others. Now, the logic has changed: you can directly participate in building an intelligent agent with autonomous thinking abilities. Modular design means flexible assembly, and open collaboration means continuous evolution. This kind of decentralized creative model actually aligns well with the foundational Web3 logic of “co-creation and sharing.”
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
9 Likes
Reward
9
4
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
AirdropHunter
· 12-05 10:43
Modular self-evolution, this logic is actually quite impressive.
Honestly, I was getting tired of all those parameter competitions before, but OpenMind's approach is really refreshing. They're doing a good job in the area of decentralized creative entities.
I just want to ask how the community participation is right now. Just being open isn't enough.
View OriginalReply0
0xLostKey
· 12-04 15:54
The modular self-evolving approach does sound different, but can it really work?
Open communities are so easy to be exploited, OpenMind needs to think about governance.
The era of parameter stacking is truly outdated, but when it comes to decentralized creation, we still have to let the data speak.
It’s “co-build and co-share” again—Web3 has been touting this for years.
Modular self-cooperation sounds powerful, but I’m afraid it’ll just end up as another tool from big companies with a new skin.
Interesting, but when will the public beta start? Is it still in the testing phase?
I like this approach—it’s much more pragmatic than those talk-only AI projects.
Wait, can a community-driven model really ensure AI capabilities keep improving? Isn’t that contradictory?
A decentralized modular system just feels like breaking a black box into a bunch of smaller black boxes.
View OriginalReply0
TideReceder
· 12-04 15:53
The idea of modular decomposition is indeed fresh, but how many projects can actually be implemented?
---
Decentralized creation sounds sexy, but I’m afraid it’s just another storyteller hyping things up.
---
Open collaboration can easily lead to information chaos. How do you ensure quality?
---
If this model really takes off, it depends on how long the community consensus can last.
---
The trick of piling up parameters is really getting old. Trying a different approach still depends on real-world applications.
---
OpenMind sounds very Web3, but what about the actual results?
---
Building agents sounds cool, but the key is how well the incentive mechanism is designed.
View OriginalReply0
ImaginaryWhale
· 12-04 15:51
The modular approach sounds good, but I'm afraid it's just another hype.
Open collaboration sounds nice, but in reality? Profit distribution is always the same old story.
These things always seem promising at first; the key is to see who can actually survive in the end.
After seeing so many AI projects lately, there are actually very few that really make you stop and take a closer look. However, there is one called OpenMind, and its approach is indeed quite different from the others.
They didn’t follow the old path of “competing on parameter scale” or “throwing money at computing power.” Their core idea goes in a different direction—breaking down the cognitive system into independent modules. These modules can evolve on their own and collaborate with each other, and more importantly, the entire system is completely open to the community.
There’s actually a lot of room for imagination here. In the past, you could only use AI tools created by others. Now, the logic has changed: you can directly participate in building an intelligent agent with autonomous thinking abilities. Modular design means flexible assembly, and open collaboration means continuous evolution. This kind of decentralized creative model actually aligns well with the foundational Web3 logic of “co-creation and sharing.”