Morning! I recently came across something interesting—zkPass, which uses zkTLS zero-knowledge proof technology.
Simply put, it lets you prove things like your account balance or on-chain transaction records without exposing the original information. Sounds pretty amazing, right?
I’m wondering if this could offer a new approach to privacy issues on Layer2. After all, instead of using a mixer to shuffle coins, you can address privacy directly at the off-chain data verification layer. But I’m not sure how effective it will be in practice. Do you guys think this direction is promising?
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
8 Likes
Reward
8
8
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
MysteriousZhang
· 9h ago
Sounds good, but can zkTLS really be implemented? I feel like we still need to wait and see.
---
There are tons of privacy solutions, but only those who use them really know how they work.
---
Off-chain verification is indeed impressive, as long as performance isn't a bottleneck.
---
Zero-knowledge proofs and privacy again—can it really be reliable this time?
---
Is the mixer approach about to die out? zkPass seems so powerful.
---
New technology is great, but how many can actually be put to real use?
---
I just want to know who in the ecosystem will be the first to take the leap.
---
Why worry so much about privacy issues—what's the point?
---
zkTLS sounds mysterious, but I still don't really understand how it actually works.
---
It feels like there's a new privacy solution every month; is this one really any different?
View OriginalReply0
BlockchainBouncer
· 12-08 06:49
Damn, if this thing really works, the privacy sector will have to reshuffle.
View OriginalReply0
IfIWereOnChain
· 12-08 06:48
Well, this thing is definitely fresh, but I’m still a bit worried about the implementation cost of zkTLS.
It sounds great in theory, but will it become a bottleneck in real-world usage...
Mixers have been played out—maybe it’s time for off-chain verification to shine. But to be honest, I’m still skeptical.
zkPass sounds promising, but can it really address L2 privacy pain points? Feels a bit overhyped to me.
This is exactly the direction I want to see, so I don’t have to worry about my on-chain identity being exposed all the time... But what about the cost, man?
View OriginalReply0
AirdropFatigue
· 12-08 06:43
This approach is indeed impressive, but can the whole mixer setup really be replaced? It still feels a bit uncertain to me.
View OriginalReply0
failed_dev_successful_ape
· 12-08 06:39
Damn, this setup feels like it could solve the long-standing privacy issue, no need to mess around with Mixers anymore.
View OriginalReply0
SchrodingersPaper
· 12-08 06:34
Damn, isn't this the pinnacle of privacy? Someone finally figured it out. But I'll bet five bucks that no one will be using it in six months...
View OriginalReply0
SchrodingerPrivateKey
· 12-08 06:32
This thing sounds pretty good, but actually being able to use it might be a different story.
zkPass does have something going for it, but when it comes to Layer2 privacy... I'm still a bit hesitant.
The demand for coin mixing has been around for a long time. Can this zkTLS solution really replace it? We still need to see the data.
It might be reliable, but I'm afraid it's another one of those projects that's perfect in theory but gets slapped in reality.
Off-chain verification sounds great, but who takes responsibility for trust issues?
If this technology can really be implemented, the entire privacy track will have a major reshuffle.
View OriginalReply0
wrekt_but_learning
· 12-08 06:31
That zk stuff sounds impressive, but there really aren’t that many practical use cases for it right now. Let’s wait and see.
Morning! I recently came across something interesting—zkPass, which uses zkTLS zero-knowledge proof technology.
Simply put, it lets you prove things like your account balance or on-chain transaction records without exposing the original information. Sounds pretty amazing, right?
I’m wondering if this could offer a new approach to privacy issues on Layer2. After all, instead of using a mixer to shuffle coins, you can address privacy directly at the off-chain data verification layer. But I’m not sure how effective it will be in practice. Do you guys think this direction is promising?