What if we measured crypto's total market capitalization against actual revenue instead? Makes you think about how traditional valuation metrics might reshape the way we look at this space.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
12 Likes
Reward
12
6
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
GasGrillMaster
· 1h ago
To be honest, this idea is a bit naive... Most crypto projects don't have any real income at all. What are they comparing to traditional valuations? Isn't this just asking for trouble?
View OriginalReply0
CryptoFortuneTeller
· 14h ago
Can traditional valuation methods really be applied to the crypto space? This logic seems a bit problematic...
View OriginalReply0
FUD_Whisperer
· 14h ago
This logic is just as flawed when applied to Web2... The real issue is that there are very few projects in the crypto space with genuine cash flow. Stop pretending.
View OriginalReply0
DefiSecurityGuard
· 14h ago
ngl, revenue metrics would absolutely expose how many of these projects are just exit liquidity traps waiting to happen. DYOR before the rugpull indicators kick in.
Reply0
liquiditea_sipper
· 14h ago
This question hits the nail on the head... Most cryptocurrencies actually have no cash flow at all, so comparing them to traditional valuation methods becomes awkward.
View OriginalReply0
SlowLearnerWang
· 14h ago
Oh no, isn't this exactly what we should have thought of earlier? We're only pondering it now...
What if we measured crypto's total market capitalization against actual revenue instead? Makes you think about how traditional valuation metrics might reshape the way we look at this space.