Futures
Access hundreds of perpetual contracts
TradFi
Gold
One platform for global traditional assets
Options
Hot
Trade European-style vanilla options
Unified Account
Maximize your capital efficiency
Demo Trading
Introduction to Futures Trading
Learn the basics of futures trading
Futures Events
Join events to earn rewards
Demo Trading
Use virtual funds to practice risk-free trading
Launch
CandyDrop
Collect candies to earn airdrops
Launchpool
Quick staking, earn potential new tokens
HODLer Airdrop
Hold GT and get massive airdrops for free
Launchpad
Be early to the next big token project
Alpha Points
Trade on-chain assets and earn airdrops
Futures Points
Earn futures points and claim airdrop rewards
On-chain tokenized stocks have recently made some waves. A leading wallet partnered with a compliant asset provider at the end of November to launch over 100 tokenized US stocks and ETF products on the BNB Chain. It sounds like a backdoor to traditional finance—users don’t need to bother with overseas brokerage accounts or wait for market open times; they can trade "Apple" and "Tesla" 24/7 using stablecoins.
The first month’s data after product launch is quite impressive. Total trading volume reached $1.07 billion, with a minting volume of $37 million in the first 72 hours alone, increasing twentyfold in just four days. It looks lively. But a closer look at the trading distribution shows that most activity is still concentrated on major stocks, with individual assets averaging daily trading volumes between $1 million and $13 million. Calling it a breakout might be an exaggeration, but the fact that people are using it and there’s stable trading flow indicates a genuine demand for this form.
From a product design perspective, it’s more like an entry point for traffic. The underlying compliance auditing and asset custody are handled by professional entities, while the wallet provider manages traffic distribution and user onboarding. The division of roles is quite clear. However, current limitations are obvious—liquidity depth is insufficient, with on-chain locked funds totaling only around $10 million; holdings are highly concentrated, with most on-chain addresses operated by market makers and issuers; and based on social discussion activity, the entire ecosystem is still in a cold start phase.
In simple terms, this exploration is testing a few key questions: Can blockchain truly support the trading of traditional assets? Can wallets evolve into financial gateways? Are Web3 users willing to hold real assets on-chain? The direction is starting to take shape, but there’s still a long way to go before mature applications are realized.
---
A 20x increase sounds great, but only over one hundred million locked? That's just virtual fat.
---
The so-called "backdoor," it turns out market makers are just having fun on their own, not interesting.
---
Wait, are there really retail investors buying Tesla on-chain? Aren't they worried about slippage haha.
---
Cold start is just a cold start, at least someone dares to take the plunge, better than doing nothing.
---
Wallets turning into financial gateways? First get the liquidity up before bragging, friends.
---
Focusing on big company stocks, I understand, small caps are too easily hammered.
---
A billion in trading volume looks impressive, but it's really just a few market makers flipping assets.
---
Good question, but the answer probably has to wait one or two more years.
---
Regulators, wallet providers, issuers—it's good enough if this chain can run smoothly.
Using wallets for traffic distribution is a good idea, but with such shallow liquidity, can it really be used?
It's just a new thing. Don't overhype the cold start.
Market makers piling up positions—be careful.
Listening to 24-hour US stock trading sounds great, but can the actual liquidity keep up?
On-chain custody of real assets? It still depends on how regulators handle this.
It's too early to say it's explosive. The data looks good, but the lack of depth is the real problem.
Isn't this just user demand validation? As long as someone uses it, that's enough. Don't overinterpret.
Liquidity is only in the tens of millions; how can it support large funds coming in?
Over 100 products, but probably all just gimmicks. Only a few top ones have real activity.
Still shouting about explosion during the cold start phase—might be a bit premature.
Wallets becoming financial gateways is a big trend, but we're just getting started.
---
The data looks impressive, but the actual retail participation is not significant. Isn't this just institutions playing around?
---
24-hour trading sounds great, but the slippage probably will cut you to the point of questioning life.
---
A billion in trading volume but only locking over ten million. This leverage... is a bit exciting haha.
---
Here's the question: what if it runs away? Can we really trust on-chain custody?
---
Cold start is cold start, take it slow. At least exploring this direction is better than doing nothing.
---
The concentration of holdings is so high mainly because market makers are playing themselves. True retail investors haven't entered yet.
---
It's called a traffic entry point in a nice way, but in a harsh way, it's just a new guise for cutting leeks... but I'm still watching.
---
If this thing really works, connecting with overseas brokers might truly be revolutionary.
---
But it still feels like the regulatory authorities' attitude towards wallets as financial gateways is a big question mark.
It's called an "entry point" in a nice way, but I see it more as a front line for cutting leeks.
A 1 billion trading volume looks impressive, but the actual ecosystem is dead cold—how could it possibly become popular?
If wallets want to become financial gateways, they need to improve liquidity first.
The data looks good, but all the holdings are from whales; retail investors going in will just get slaughtered.
Real applications are still a long way off; this wave might just be a quick scam and then run.
I just want to know, if these tokenized stocks blow up, who will cover the losses?
It still feels like an experiment; don’t take it too seriously.